Who's sexier: Virginia Madsen or Jennifer Connelly?
-
moviestar26 — 15 years ago(February 22, 2011 05:35 AM)
People will have individual opinions on who they would prefer. I presume it would be dependant on age and personality preferences. Madsen is more attractive but has a very bad character. Not all women would possess all qualities.
-
jmasseysr7 — 15 years ago(March 14, 2011 06:54 PM)
As I look back, it has to be MadsenBut when I gaze into those piercing eyes of Connelly I am not so sureJennifer maintains her magnetism as gracefully as she ageslike a fine wine
"the primary objects of desire & of thought are the same-Jeff Massey [Poor Richard's Son] -
Loincloth — 14 years ago(June 16, 2011 04:41 AM)
Have read through this post with interest; this is something I've thought about since I first saw the film twenty years ago, and several times since. For my money, this was Virginia Madsen (who's still hot, saw her recently in The Event and her shelf's just magnetic) at her absolute peak. Jennifer Connelly's peak didn't come until a few years later: two words - Mulholland Falls. Connelly in the form she's in in that film doesn't blow Madsen in the form she's in in this away - no-one could - but she's clearly at least a half-cut above. In this more ingenuey phase though: it's close, very close. Ultimately, Connelly's more beautiful, but Madsen's just hotter. (And slightly bustier even back then, which helps)