Remake?

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Film and Television Discussion

---

vgmaster9 — 18 years ago(October 16, 2007 04:30 AM)

Do you think they should make a remake? When I mean by that, I mean the way the remakes for The Thing, The Fly, and The Blob. This one should be just like them.

[fgadmin]

maxeythecat — 18 years ago(November 08, 2007 12:16 AM)

No, they'd probably find some way to muck it up.just leave this delightful cheezefest alone and we'll all be happy.

[fgadmin]

amazon423 — 16 years ago(February 17, 2010 07:56 AM)

Definitely no remake. The original is usually the best anyway.For all the new effects they can put in electronically the old ones are scarier because they had to be more creative to scare the daylights out of people.

[fgadmin]

jonathanmarklund — 16 years ago(March 09, 2010 02:14 AM)

No!
I don't want to see this in 3d with poor CGI effects and teenager in all the roles.

[fgadmin]

mazaldivar — 15 years ago(September 04, 2010 11:30 PM)

NOOOOOOOOO!
A 3-D Spaghetti Western rereleased to theatres cominatyanoir3d.com Comin' soon!

[fgadmin]

profbrane — 13 years ago(October 17, 2012 09:05 AM)

No. They could not improve it, only screw it up.

[fgadmin]

gestroud — 9 years ago(December 16, 2016 05:29 PM)

A sequel might bring interesting

[fgadmin]

Woodyanders — 7 years ago(June 24, 2018 01:31 AM)

This film doesn't need a remake; it's fine the way it is.
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.

[fgadmin]

jbaker1-2 — 2 weeks ago(March 14, 2026 10:11 AM)

People who go on about how this or that movie "needs a remake" need to be horsewhipped, tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail.
There are 8.2 billion people in the world. 8.19 billion of them have never heard of and don't give a fuck about Charlie Kirk. Get over it.