da best prison-break: 'Le Trou' (1960)
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Film and Television Discussion
Paul P. Powell — 6 months ago(September 07, 2025 06:36 AM)
Like most people, I've seen plenty of prison movies. But I don't know that I ever had a particular favorite.
If asked to name any specific title which I thought was relatively well-made?
Likely I would have named, '
Papillon
' by Schaffner. It's pretty good, but not quite a prison flick.
Or, '
Escape from Alcatraz
' by Eastwood. What else really is there?
Hah. What ignorance. It's almost embarrassing.
'Le Trou'
(aka, '
The Hole
' –a 1960 French crime classic which is increasingly hard to find these days –is based on a true story).
Simply has no peers. Exemplary.
Taut, up-close, intimate, tense. Non-professional actors. One of the men was former inmate involved with the real-life breakout. He serves as actor and as technical advisor.
This is not a movie about prison riots, or prison life, or sadistic guards. It is not
'Brute Force'
nor
'Riot in Cellblock 11'
not '
The Birdman of Alcatraz'.
Nevermind these dramas. Thinking the matter over reflectively, I'll confirm that this flick is truly the best prison-beak movie I've ever seen.
Paul P. Powell, Pool Player -
BennyMuso82 — 6 months ago(September 08, 2025 10:42 AM)
I doubt it's better than A Prophet (2009).
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt1235166/
Chopper: I'm just a bloody normal bloke. A normal bloke who likes a bit of torture -
Paul P. Powell — 6 months ago(September 09, 2025 02:19 AM)
Meh. Not convinced.
- First of all, this title you cite it has not stood the test of time.
- Second, it doesn't even appear to be a prison break flick. '
Le Trou'
is pure prison break, nothing else. No mobs, no gangs, no drugs. - Next. I can tell at a glance another reason why its not in the same league. Why?
3a. Just observe the crappy, computerized teal/orange cinematography. Probably shot with digital rather than 35MM. As you know, the teal/orange color model is the well-known hallmark of contemporary 'lab-made' cinema. Such photography immediately strikes the eye as phony; over-touched, over-finessed. It just doesn't jibe optically, with human vision.
3b. Whereas 'Le Trou' was created with only lights, cameras, and men. Not with thousands of computer techs. - What else is there to recommend this recent-release you claim to admire. Well? I notice it is festooned with cheap laurels. Internet-era gushing; rather than true evaluation. The awards in this case mean nothing because a truly critical audience is long gone.
What I'm talking about was the filmgoing audience before popculture. When awards meant something.
Contemporary critics are mostly unable to judge anything with the long-view, the historical view. Today's awards bodies will shower hoopla on anything, and their hoopla is driven by viral marketing.
Said another way: they're not rigorously reviewing genuine 'innovation' versus 'copycatting'. A contemporary filmmaker can simply ape or mimic any classic and get away with an award. That's what Tarantino proved, after all.
Another examples: Christopher Nolan setting out to direct
"Inception"
and admitting he had never seen
"Last Year in Marienbad"
, the obvious forerunner of all non-linear storytelling. D'oh.
This is almost the inverse of Tarantino–'knowing too little' rather than 'knowing too much'.
In sum:
Credit must always go to the pioneer, rather than to any lazy tecchie-slouches who come traipsing down the turnpike decades later. Coasting on pop-media culture is no challenging feat.
When someone has broken the trail before you, it's easy to pick your way!
Paul P. Powell, Pool Player
-
TaraDeS — 6 months ago(September 09, 2025 10:43 PM)
Paul P. Powell September 07, 2025 08:36 AM
Member since August 26, 2025
Like most people, I've seen plenty of prison movies. But I don't know that I ever had a particular favorite.
If asked to name any specific title which I thought was relatively well-made?
Likely I would have named, 'Papillon' by Schaffner. It's pretty good, but not quite a prison flick.
Or, 'Escape from Alcatraz' by Eastwood. What else really is there?
Hah. What ignorance. It's almost embarrassing.
'Le Trou' (aka, 'The Hole' –a 1960 French crime classic which is increasingly hard to find these days –is based on a true story).
Simply has no peers. Exemplary.
Taut, up-close, intimate, tense. Non-professional actors. One of the men was former inmate involved with the real-life breakout. He serves as actor and as technical advisor.
This is not a movie about prison riots, or prison life, or sadistic guards. It is not 'Brute Force' nor 'Riot in Cellblock 11' not 'The Birdman of Alcatraz'.
Nevermind these dramas. Thinking the matter over reflectively, I'll confirm that this flick is truly the best prison-beak movie I've ever seen.
BennyMuso82 September 09, 2025 11:44 PM
Member since February 25, 2025
You've not watched it.
But buddy AI watched it with a pitch of
Französisch
.
The movie isn't
"increasingly hard to find"
.
You can watch it on Filmboards…La durée totale du film est de 131 minutes!
https://www.filmboards.com/board/10054407/
However, the best prison break is this one:
EXTREME PRISON BREAK
Hamster
Captain Coal, Cat
Dr. Max, Chinchilla
Bubbo
Bonne nuit!
-
Paul P. Powell — 6 months ago(September 10, 2025 12:26 AM)
Nope. I don't plan to either. Wouldn't waste attention on any flick from the, '
bro culture'
junkyard period we're in.
It's like in US sports, what we call '
garbage time
'. A film needs to at least be Criterion, or BFI, or Library of Congress to get a look from me.
Think of it this way:
Aerosmith
vs clownish imitations like:
Bon Jovi
Guns'n' Roses
Which do you choose? No question as far as I'm concerned.
Paul P. Powell, Pool Player -
Paul P. Powell — 6 months ago(September 13, 2025 05:15 AM)
Sorry, nah. Nawp. Not likely.
A film like Godfather has influenced scads of subsequent filmmakers. After all the critics are done, after all the audiences are done …it is other filmmakers who are the tell-tale acid-test.
'Godfather'
blew the doors off not only up-and-coming directors but even older filmmakers like Stanley Kubrick
It wowed even contemporary filmmakers (contemporary in age to Ford Coppola) such as Sidney Lumet.
Neither of these two giants were afraid to call 'Godfather' the best film ever made.
They rose eagerly from their seats, to say so.
Their reaction is a touchstone. Great works of art inspire emulators.
Whereas, whatever recent-release teal/orange digital movie you're commending, has influenced nobody. Will influence nobody.
It's from the quick-twitch era where we're all drowning in pools of meaningless media product.
It is simply one more pointless little rivulet in the mouth of a Mississippi.
Such flicks are all forgotten in ten years no matter how much hype they initially generate. They will never attain the same stature.
Some flick got some awards, did it? Oy. No biggie So did the film which came along the year after and so did whatever film came along the year before.
Paul P. Powell, Pool Player -
I Got This! — 6 months ago(September 14, 2025 10:01 AM)
What else really is there?
Shawshank Redemption is a classic and very well beloved.
I liked the recent Count of Monte Cristo and the one with Richard Chamberlain.
The more recent Escape from Pretoria is awesome and even better based on a true story of those political prisoners on the right side of history being against S. Africa apartheid escaped on what should not have been a crime.
Making keys out of wood to get out was genius and amazing!
Likely I would have named, 'Papillon' by Schaffner. It's pretty good, but
not quite a prison flick.
How so? -
Paul P. Powell — 6 months ago(September 14, 2025 03:13 PM)
Stephen King's '
Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption
' –later turned into a hit movie –was a hit, but is not a classic.
It made plenty of money and a lot of kids liked it –but this can be said about a lot of modern popculture. Network TV shows, cable TV series, movies, videogames.
Nevertheless it was not produced nor released in the classic era. It was released in the era of 'movie consumption'. Different demographic.
King himself –all his fiction is part of 'popculture churn' (recycling cultural references from the past into new products).
Scorcese has spoken witheringly about this consumerism
(he also admitted recently that he won't even attend movies in a theater anymore, due to smartphones)
So when I asked, "
What else really is there?"
I'm not casting my net so wide as to include flicks from the Lucas\Spielberg\Cameron era. They never count.
Instead, I was casting around for any true milestones, anything from the silent era onwards up through cinema verite' and further along up towards 'New Hollywood'. Anything which sets the first foundation-stone and mints the first boilerplate.
Prison-break movies (Eastwood's "
Escape from Alcatraz
") were well-established as proven popculture moneymakers long before 'Shawshank' came around. It wasn't any kind of risk or gamble.
2.
Now, regarding '
Papillon
' and several others I mentioned in my OP –'
Papillon
' doesn't quite take place inside a prison. It's not a prison break movie. Rather it takes place on a series of islands. His goal is to escape the islands.
Same thing with '
Riot in Cellblock 11
'. This is a movie about a prison riot.
'
The Birdman of Alcatraz
' –is a film about a man adjusting to life inside prison.
Same applies to '
The Jericho Mile
'.
Charles Bronson's terrific action flick, '
Breakout'
–fun as hell –but not about prisoners breaking out. Instead, a man (Robert Duvall) is broken out of prison with help from the outside.
Burt Lancaster in
'Brute Force
' is a story about a battle of wills between sadistic guards and despairing inmates. There is a prison break but it is negligible to the story.
'Fast Walking
' with James Woods –ditto.
'Each Dawn I Die'
–Jimmy Cagney & George Raft. Set in a prison, but nothing to do with breaking out.
You see what I mean? "
Le Trou
" is pure prison break; nothing else. Nothing else about criminal justice or the legal system or the rights of man. Just the break.
Paul P. Powell, Pool Player -
I Got This! — 6 months ago(September 14, 2025 08:06 PM)
You see what I mean? "Le Trou" is pure prison break; nothing else. Nothing else about criminal justice or the legal system or the rights of man. Just the break.
If you're criteria to accept a suggestion of a prison break movie is just all about the break then it is going to be a very short list as you are showing.
I don't mind the backstory, character development and subplots of the convicts, how they got there and their life behind bars.
That is what makes Shawshank so good and a classic.
And yes, it is considered a classic since the word means:
judged over a period of time to be of the highest quality and outstanding of its kind.
Shawshank does this.
It is so well beloved and popular and is one of the best movies ever made.
We are drawn in to care and sympathize for the characters and their plight and cheer when the main one succeeds at beating a corrupt and sadistic warden and his guard by escaping.
I find prison to be a fascinating other world within ours so I'm willing to check out all kinds of movies about prisoners and their situations and motivations to escape if that is part of the movie.
Prison movies I like that do not involve escape include:
Brubaker.
One about a warden who tries to change the system for prison reform and has to fight the powers that be in a struggle for it while he discovers a very grim past connected to the prison that the corrupt powers want to be kept as a secret.
The Longest Yard
An excellent movie about a disgraced football player organizing and coaching a team of convicts to play the guards for a chance to redeem himself. -
Paul P. Powell — 6 months ago(September 15, 2025 02:32 AM)
Ayah. None of these are prison-breaks.
They're perhaps set in a prison; but they're not about breaking out of prison.
It's a narrow but strict definition I'm applying here.
A better debate would be John Sturges' "
The Great Escape
" except the argument fails; because this is a war movie. They're not breaking out of a prison.
I explicitly deal with classics, not Luc\Berg modernity.
I'd go so far as to label 'Shawshank' slop. Who would argue with me? The dumbass Gen-X n00b audience who gobbled it up? Those scumbags?
Said another way: Rob Reiner is not an auteur. Not a pioneer. Same as Eastwood, he simply reverted back to tried-and-true studio styling to guarantee the turnstyles would turn.
No one is ever gonna emulate Rob Reiner's style. He has no unique style to call his own. What are young directors always doing? Trying to repeat the artistry of Edgar G. Ulmer.
Reiner's products lack any true pedigree or maturity. No stature whatsoever except that they happened to turn out to be money-makers. They are the mundane codswallop that turn up on the 'AFI Best 100 Movies list'. Utter kowtow.
I'd go so far as to assert that 'Shawshank' (likewise anything by Eastwood) are no better nor no lesser as any of the other flicks of its era (Tom Cruise, Sly Stallone, Arnie, etc).
Cut from the same bolt of cloth.
Paul P. Powell, Pool Player -
I Got This! — 6 months ago(September 16, 2025 05:52 AM)
Maybe those movies and filmmakers you dislike are not making the kinds of movies you prefer but that does not diminish their craft any less.
They have made successful movies which kept them active because they gave us movies that are good and draw us in which become beloved classics.
I mean, they did something right.
We both have what we like and prefer with our opinions and if movies in a more modern era is not your thing then it isn't your thing.
Whatever.
To each our own.
From seeing your choices and the way you look down on the movies I suggest and prefer I don't think we are going to find much common ground or agreement with them.
Are there any American movies you like?
And if so which years or era?
Getting back to the prison theme…
In another post we both agreed on liking Runaway Train.
Is that a prison break movie that fits in for your criteria of Le Trou? -
Paul P. Powell — 6 months ago(September 16, 2025 06:54 PM)
Maybe those movies and filmmakers you dislike are not the kinds of movies you prefer but that does not diminish their any less.
Gotta diverge from most of your remarks above. There are objective criteria which reliably measure the decline in movie quality once the studio-era was shuttered. It's not purely subjective.
Naturally, this doesn't mean I'm disagreeing with you, with any rancor or spleen. Live and let live.
I understand that everyday, average film-buffs will usually not agree with me. Ah well. No matter.
After all, it's just like music. Most people tend to dig the music they happened to hear when they were in high school. They're not music scholars or historians, they just groove to whatever they grooved to as teens. That's what they feel sentimental towards, so that's what they advocate for.
But when it comes to any kind of culture, this is not what I'm doing. I matriculated a bit differently.
Are there any American movies you like?
Yes, certainly. I maintain numerous shortlists. Like this:
Personal Favorite Fifty US Films 1920s
Objective Best Fifty US Films 1920s
…for each decade. Listing them first by my personal taste and then a second time by more rational criteria.
Then, I expand it:
Personal Favorite 250 Films of - All Time - World Cinema
Objective Best 250 Films - All Time - US Cinema
I sift 'n sort, mix 'n match every way I can to cover all bases. It's obsessiveness on my part, I admit it.
In another post we both agreed on Runaway Train. Is that a break movie that fits in for your criteria of Le Trou?
No. It's a train movie. As fine as it is, the challenges faced by the protagonist are completely different.
Paul P. Powell, Pool Player