Which one you like better between Part 3 or Part 2?
-
csweetleaf2 — 17 years ago(June 30, 2008 01:19 PM)
I thought the first 25 minutes of Smokey 2 and the showdown in the desert were good moments, I also liked the part where Junior was done using the bathroom, I was LMAO on that part.
I thought Jerry Reed did an mediocre job playing the bandit, I didn't think he was the right actor to play the bandit, I thought that if Burt Reynolds portrayed the bandit along with Sally Field coming back for the third movie it could've been a really good movie, it may not be a classic like the original but it would've definitely been a huge improvement over Smokey 2. -
Traianus — 16 years ago(August 15, 2009 09:15 PM)
Growing up, I always thought part 2 was better. A few years ago, I watched the two films back to back with people who had known nothing of the Smokey and the Bandits before and had only just recently watched the first one. They were unanimous in finding Part 3 much, much better and much, much funnier. They universally thought Part 2 was the worse movie and basically found it unfunny and boring and thought the whole elephant theme was a terrible idea.
Ever since then, I've found myself agreeing more and more with them, and I enjoy part 3 more (even if it's technically a worse-made film in many ways) with each new viewing. -
Jetfire59 — 16 years ago(October 20, 2009 06:46 AM)
Neither. They're both awful. I would watch 3 if there was nothing else on just as I did not half an hour ago, but I'd rather watch paint dry than see 2 again.
HUMAN, HELL! I emptied a 15 round clip of hollow points into 'im and he barely FLINCHED! -
dlee7283 — 14 years ago(August 29, 2011 10:32 AM)
Part 2 just rubbed me the wrong way and it always will. I guess the producers wanted to show the dark side of the Bandit fame and then go back to the Bandit roots towards the end and go back to showing off, yet it was too little too late and poorly written at that.These movies aren't meant to be introspective, they are meant for leaving your brain at the door and having fun.
Part 3 tried its best to be entertaining despite not having someone as important as Burt Reynolds who IS and always will be the Bandit.Part 3 is a bad movie,sure. However, it doesn't take itself seriously and is very entertaining; which is good enough in my book for the price of admission and as a Bandit movie fan. -
Beeracuda — 14 years ago(September 01, 2011 07:13 AM)
Part 3 wasn't a very good movie, but Part 2 was FAR worse. It's been quite a few years since I've seen Part 2, but if I remember correctly, it was about a pregnant elephant, and too serious of a story line between Reynolds and Field. I don't remember any fun with that movie. Part 3 is without Reynolds and Field, and Jerry Reed was certainly not a lead actor, but Jackie Gleason still provided some decent laughs with his one liners.
"Move that cone!! I'm Lindsay Lohan!!" -
Woodyanders — 8 months ago(July 30, 2025 12:29 AM)
I prefer the second one because it reunited Burt and Sally; their chemistry is spot-on cute and appealing in both Smokey movies that they did together.
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.