Non-global warming?
-
Mithrandir-Olorin888 — 18 years ago(January 08, 2008 12:57 AM)
Watch Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement
www.RonPaul2008.com
America's Last Hope for Freedom!!!! -
AdventureClub — 17 years ago(June 12, 2008 09:47 AM)
Although Endgame is a good documentary, I don't remember it having anything to do with global warming.
The Great Global Warming Swindle is a good documentary concerning this subject. You can find it on google video. -
inspectors71 — 17 years ago(November 05, 2008 10:28 AM)
Crichton was a great scientific mind. He believed that human actions influenced the climate, but that the hysterical link perpetrated by agenda-driven scientists that humans were somehow destroying the planet was invalid. Read "State of Fear" to get a real feel for how science should and shouldn't be conducted.
By the way, I refer to Crichton in the past tense because the news services are reporting his death this morning. He, and his razor-sharp mind will be missed.
"You eat guts."Nick Devlin -
fgooshd — 17 years ago(November 06, 2008 03:16 PM)
Which TSI data are you using? Perhaps we can compare our trend analyses. I suspect (and in fact know) yours are woefully incorrect, if even done at all.
The melt on Mars is a regional phenomenon, not a global climate change (See
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v435/n7039/full/nature03561.html
).
Which glaciers? Have a look at the numbers, when you can (See
http://nsidc.org/
). Try the Sea Ice Index. What do the trends in extent show?
If you actually had something useful to contribute you would have painstakingly analyzed what data are available, written a paper detailing why tens of thousands of scientists have been so very wrong, and submitted it to a relevant journal (try Nature or Geophysical Research Letters). But you know better than to open yourself up to such well deserved ridicule.
I b68genuinely hope you're not involved in a scientific discipline or any enterprise where capable analysis is required. -
fgooshd — 17 years ago(November 07, 2008 06:44 PM)
If you had read my post you would know I didn't ask you to submit your analysis to imdb but to an academic journal. Swing and a miss.
The hockey stick isn't a theory. It's a temperature reconstruction by Manb68n, Bradley, and Hughes (MBH98). It has nothing to do with Al Gore and it isn't a scam. You may take issue with their use of non-centered PCA, but beyond that the paper and its analysis are sound. Mann et al even have a new temperature reconstruction (See
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2008/09/02/0805721105.full.pdf+html
). Have at it.
The science of climate change is complex. Anyone can't simply casually acquaint themselves with the science and expect to realistically determine what's well conducted science and what isn't. There are those who understand radiative physics, and those who do not. Those who have a grasp of the mathematics involved, and those who do not. That you've so arrogantly decided to denigrate the work of thousands of individuals (individuals far, far, far more capable than you) because you heard from some guy whose uncle read on the internet that it's all a hoax, when it's so painfully obvious that you haven't the knowledge nor ability to realistically appraise the current state of the science, speaks very poorly for you.
If you have this source from climatologists then produce it.
As it is, you're just another denialist trying to disprove a multi-decadal trend with a single month of data ("August was so very cold this year, what a hoax!"). And that is so very pathetic.
Curious that you choose the word believe. -
AnthonySocksss — 10 months ago(May 28, 2025 01:17 PM)
He was another climate-change denying loon.
Like those anti-vaxxer celebs
Melton1 Wanted for Pedophilia:
https://i.ibb.co/6cnPmJVr/IMG-0830.jpg
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/Zjxk307CND0
