Absolutely woeful
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC
I'VE BEEN OAN THE LASH FER 5 WEEKS — 4 years ago(March 19, 2022 07:32 AM)
A dark superhero movie for the sake of it. There's absolutely nothing good about this at all - it's just utter garbage. I left the cinema taking nothing from this.
Nolan's TDK trilogy was a masterpiece, and tbf 'Joker' was pretty damn good too. This though, is terrible. Delete, move on etc.
It's just ****ing awful in every way.
Thank you for talking to me -
I'VE BEEN OAN THE LASH FER 5 WEEKS — 4 years ago(March 19, 2022 09:42 AM)
Not really no. I like him a lot but this movie is pointless and shouldn't exist.
I think the main problem is it was made by a hack. If they wanted to maintain the same level of quality as Nolan they would have needed something better than some nerd who made planet of the apes movies.
And Let Me In was utter **** compared to the Swedish original
Thank you for talking to me -
MagneticMonopole — 4 years ago(March 19, 2022 06:50 PM)
I absolutely agree about Let Me In. It's a very poor copy of the amazing original movie.
It's fine if you don't like it, but don't make the mistake of calling it a copy. It isn't. It is just a different interpretation of the same novel the Swedish film adapted, and even includes things from the novel that the Swedish film cut out. (I personally thought it was better.) -
MagneticMonopole — 4 years ago(March 19, 2022 07:30 PM)
Yea, it was just a coincidence that an American version with a hack director came out shortly after the hugely successful Swedish original.
It was simply inevitable that Hollywood would make a film out of it whether someone did the same in Sweden first or not. When a novel sells a ton of copies and gets enthusiastically endorsed by Stephen King, Hollywood tends to notice. -
Steve Lake — 4 years ago(March 19, 2022 07:36 PM)
It's an exact copy. You come as someone who didn't see the American version. The original is a classic and the remake **** for shot was pointless.
Even the original though left put an insane amount of stuff from the book. Because unlike you I actually read the book.
The only poster who had his account banned 4 times without ever breaking any rules each of those times. -
MagneticMonopole — 4 years ago(March 19, 2022 07:43 PM)
It's an exact copy.
No it isn't. You have no idea what you are talking about. There's an entire minor subplot in the American version that is specific to American culture of the 1980's that isn't in the book or Swedish version.
Get your head out of your ass.
You come as someone who didn't see the American version.
You also aren't making any kind of sense.
Because unlike you I actually read the book.
I read the book before the Swedish or American adaptations had ever been made, **** for brains. -
nemesis — 3 years ago(April 17, 2022 11:22 PM)
It is more or less shot for shot LTROI, except that the American version left out a hugely important plot point.
It was a pointless, pointless remake which brought nothing new to the table except an insult to the audience. -
nemesis — 3 years ago(April 17, 2022 11:49 PM)
Calm down! I "literally" do have an idea What I'm talking about, having read the book and seen both films. What am I lying about?
The Swedish adaptation is superior in so many ways. There is a real connection between Oskar and Eli which is unfortunately missing In Let me In. It also includes the very important plot point I mentioned in my previous post. You must know what I'm talking about?
In the American version there are several identical scenes which are almost shot for shot. This has been observed by many people, viewers and critics alike, including respected film critic Mark Kermode. So it's pretty much indisputable.