Calling it

[fgadmin]

mddwbsst — 9 years ago(January 08, 2017 06:36 PM)

Really, it depends on the decade.

[fgadmin]

Hassan_Scarborough — 9 years ago(January 09, 2017 10:36 AM)

Which is funny seeing as she existed in multiple decades.

[fgadmin]

littleyellowfish — 9 years ago(January 07, 2017 01:36 PM)

Well, guess it's only a matter of time before the theorists show up saying she's the villain of the movie.
"How come nobody's ever tried to be a superhero?" - Dave Lizewski, 2010.

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

ThisGuy4000 — 9 years ago(January 07, 2017 02:13 PM)

That she's going to be "cringeworthy"?

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

npfares — 9 years ago(January 08, 2017 12:08 AM)

This movie will, at best, 'make its money back'.

[fgadmin]

JasonRebourne — 9 years ago(January 08, 2017 03:24 AM)

The film itself might, but this character is gonna be the Scrappy.
I don't care about a troll who doesn't pay for his opinion telling me how to review movies.

[fgadmin]

politicidal — 9 years ago(January 08, 2017 12:42 PM)

I'll see your call and raise you "Etta Candy is the cringeworthy comic relief that is actually a HYDRA spy".
Whatever you are, be a good one.

[fgadmin]

JasonRebourne — 9 years ago(January 09, 2017 04:46 AM)

Wrong universe.
I don't care about a troll who doesn't pay for his opinion telling me how to review movies.

[fgadmin]

politicidal — 9 years ago(January 09, 2017 09:42 AM)

WB is desperate. They don't care.
Whatever you are, be a good one.

[fgadmin]

Siroccosonofra — 9 years ago(January 15, 2017 04:16 PM)

That's exactly what she was in the comics.