I actually liked Spider-Man 3…
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC
vishSpal — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 09:28 AM)
When I first saw the trailer for Spider-Man 3 I was so excited, because the black suit/Venom was going to be in it. When I first saw the film I was really disappointed. After seeing TASM and TASM 2 I started to appreciate Spider-Man 3 more, and realize it's an underrated film. Sure it's not as good as Spider-Man 2, but I feel like Spider-Man 3 wraps the entire trilogy nicely. What about everyone else?
-
CthulhuWept — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 12:45 PM)
They screwed up Venom, and they screwed up Harry. And after the previous films, Sandman makes absolutely no sense. Also, there's too much insipid Peter/MJ drama. Also, emo Peter.
Other than that, yeah, it was really good. -
-
KthulhuX — 9 years ago(November 30, 2016 08:42 PM)
Question for you: Do you mean the three minutes where Peter had a different hairstyle, but was actually acting happy? Or the entire rest of the trilogy where he seemed like he was skating on the razor's edge of suicidal depression? Because I find it ridiculous that people label the former "emo" while ignoring the fact that the later is FAR more emo.
-
-
KCJ506 — 9 years ago(November 03, 2016 01:54 PM)
Yeah, Spider-man only had about 20 minutes of screentime in Civil War. It would have been a good movie even if he hadn't been included.
Its amazing how people hang around message boards of movies they dont like -
ArigatouNosferatu — 9 years ago(November 12, 2016 05:19 PM)
I actually think the film would benefit
without
Spider-Man in it. For me, especially after watching a second time, I thought the pace of the narrative was put on hold for that whole section. And while yes, he does bring some fun to the airport scene, he jolts the film and adds on unnecessary bulk just to squeeze him in there for future reference.