Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. WOW, Richard Lester HATED Superman

WOW, Richard Lester HATED Superman

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
12 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC


    granitodiaz — 11 years ago(July 21, 2014 04:47 PM)

    watching this on tv, and can't believe all the corny, stupid humor he put into the movie, he clearly didn't have any respect for the source material
    Why the creators of Superman didn't hire somebody else?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      michaelsmith30 — 11 years ago(July 21, 2014 10:07 PM)

      Richard Donner grew up reading the comics. Clearly Lester was the wrong man for the job. Had Donner and Tom Manckiewicz been around for III, it would have been a much better movie.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        wallacesawyer — 11 years ago(July 25, 2014 07:43 PM)

        The Salkinds brought back Richard Lester because they wanted more creative control over the film. Richard Donner and the Salkinds never got along.
        I enjoy this film all things considered, but the humor was a bit overdone.
        http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          granitodiaz — 11 years ago(August 25, 2014 07:38 AM)

          what I don't understand is people talk like those were the only 2 directors in the entire world

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            wallacesawyer — 11 years ago(August 25, 2014 05:38 PM)

            what I don't understand is people talk like those were the only 2 directors in the entire world
            No, they just happened to be the ones the Salkinds used.
            http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              TMC-4 — 11 years ago(September 14, 2014 02:18 AM)

              I think also, the Salkinds still owed Lester money over his
              Three Musketeers
              films (in which the Salkinds split it into two movies w/o Lester's consent or prior knowledge).

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                IMDb User

                This message has been deleted.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Passport-To-Pimlico — 11 years ago(August 08, 2014 06:12 AM)

                  source material
                  If you're so into source material, my suggestion to you is to read a comic instead of watching this movie.
                  "These days, if say you're English, you'll get arrested and thrown in jail"

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    snoho — 10 years ago(July 15, 2015 06:10 PM)

                    Or perhaps they could just re-watch the first two instead which are easily superior. The studio and director should've put in more effort if they expected anyone to take it seriously.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      d_henderson1810 — 11 years ago(November 22, 2014 05:37 AM)

                      I think that the scenes Richard Lester changed in Superman II, for the most part, were for the best, and made the movie even better.
                      However, Superman III does show what happens when Richard Donner has no involvement.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Bourne1886 — 10 years ago(July 22, 2015 09:25 AM)

                        No they weren't, Lester ruined it, he had no respect or liking for Superman and it made number 2 so disjointed. He completely lost the meaning of Supermans origin and story from number 1 and all his aditions were meaningless. He refilmed parts just to get a credit but they were worse for the most part. No real effort or responsibility went into the parts he directed and it looked like they were filmed with out any passion. Clark crossing the road and denting the cab for example was so badly done and made no sense. It should have been a deleted scene.
                        Kidder and Hackman hated Donner being sacked so Kidders part was reduced to a cameo for three and Hackman refused to come back for 2. All the Hackman scenes in the theatrical cut of 2 were filmed by Donner. He didn't trust in Lester and was spot on. If Donner had no involvement in number 2 it would have been even worse and would have been as pathetic as number 3.
                        If Donner and Mankiewicz had been left in charge of number 2 and 3, the Superman franchise/film legacy would have been much better off as they had a better understanding and presentation of the character and the material!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          granitodiaz — 10 years ago(August 19, 2015 12:18 PM)

                          bump
                          The stupid have one thing in common.They alter the facts to fit their views not the other way

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups