This message has been deleted.
-
∂³∑x² — 11 months ago(April 23, 2025 04:51 PM)
That's nice, I think that's a real valuable sentiment to share with other
But cynics will always be sceptical about such things. Why don't you make an edit to it so that people can see that you are who you say you are and not just some freeloading troll looking to steal someone else's argument for their own ends
People can be like that you know
I've got an archive of how it was
before the edit for any naysayers
Call me ∑ -
johnksteele92 — 11 years ago(February 27, 2015 08:55 AM)
What a typical feminine shaming tactic. More people than you realize spend their small bits of free time
reading
current events, and then forming and expressing political opinions. This is not so obsessive as to dominate our lives - although the way things are going with the leftist neutering of Western culture, we certainly need a greater number of obsessive antifeminists.
No other political opinions bring out so much womanish shaming language and cliquey social takedown attacks than those which oppose the dogma of feminism; except maybe advocacy of racial segregation. This is because feminism operates, in essence, as a modern religion; not based in any observable fact, but ruthlessly attacking all opposers and getting them shunned from their jobs and communities (
;
;
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/03/how-dongle-jokes-got-two-pe ople-fired-and-led-to-ddos-attacks/
).
The pay gap myth has been debunked time and again, as have their lies about rape and domestic violence. This does not stop politicians and Hollywood personalities from constantly repeating them, because feminism is
the
fashionable liberal cause of our day, having supplanted "going green" years ago. Hollywood professionals and other West Coast gentry wear feminism for the same reason that they buy scarves, designer dresses, Priuses, Apple products, and vinyl albums. -
johnksteele92 — 11 years ago(February 27, 2015 11:34 AM)
I can tell you why feminists like the no-taking-husband's-name law; they write off all women who don't agree with them as brainwashed victims of "internalized misogyny" which "the patriarchy" forcefully penetrated into them. This is one example of how feminism claims to be something new and revolutionary, but really it's all just a rehashing of the age-old narrative of women being helpless damsels in need of saving (who in no way
chose
to live with the dragon for three years). -
rascal67 — 11 years ago(February 27, 2015 07:54 PM)
when it suits the needs of the feminist cause, they have no problem painting grown-ass women as helpless children.
They want empowerment and then only serve to dis-empower themselves, by playing the victim. They will use selective reasoning and ideals, to manipulate their own warped and contradictory stance.
Isn't it great being a 'masculinist' and promoting our own powerful male gender? A force that is to be reckoned with, that will make women weak at the knees. -
rascal67 — 11 years ago(March 02, 2015 03:48 AM)
A woman is deliberately submissive, naturally, if the man can do something for her.
Since women need and want men in their lives, and many may not want to acknowledge this on an existential level, it then becomes a game. Let's now pretend to be submissive and pander to the man's needs, so I can then get what I want, to appease my own self-entitlements and personal agenda. If men can't be trusted, what about the women then? It comes down to a lack of 'honesty' and this tends to get swept under the rug with many, as the self-serving part of the ego, is anything but.
Yes, women are no better than men, only they think they are better at hiding it, being the mysterious creatures they are. -
LukeLovesFilm28 — 11 years ago(March 02, 2015 04:34 PM)
Since so many women today are so heavily influenced / confused by the lies, propaganda and manipulation of feminists, I feel confident that women today are more unnatural than any other time in history. On a whole, they are so disconnected from their nature and nature itself that they don't have any clue how hard life would be without all the contributions of men that they take for granted. But, in the most hostile environments, women naturally flock to strong males to serve them and protect them. That's what creates a patriarch, when women are either too scared of their environment or they're too lazy to handle it on their own, they empower men to take care of it all for them.
Today, they have cell phones anywhere they go which obviously makes them feel secure ALL THE TIME. The constant access to 911 makes them feel like they don't need men for personal security anymore. They don't even think that it may take police close to 15 to 30 minutes to respond to some 911 calls. Anything else they fear is imagined BS like an old lady believing everything she reads in The Enquirer.
Without all of these luxuries, conveniences and technologies, they would be right back to square one, terrified of all the natural sounds that they can't see at night. They actually condemn men for our natural responses of aggressive protection. The natural instinct to keep our pregnant mates safe from a giant, fierce, natural predator is now a bad thing. They label it as a sign of a controlling man. To actually protect our family is a sign of something bad. I can't believe it. -
LukeLovesFilm28 — 11 years ago(March 02, 2015 04:50 PM)
Yeah, ok. But to me, it doesn't seem healthy to resent or condemn your biologically defined nature. We can't trust others to take care of everything for us forever. I prefer to be much more self-reliant and that means embracing my nature.
Also, I have to say that while men and women are not the same, that does not mean we're not equal in worth. We both just have different functions which are biologically supposed to compliment each other. This makes relationships between men and women actually possible. They learn from us and we learn from them. BUT, these feminists have been condemning all things male so long, the scale is tipped too far in the favor of the feminine.