she doesn't look 52!
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Sandra Bullock
acriser15 — 9 years ago(October 29, 2016 02:28 AM)
she really never aged! still looks very young and in good shape! i've seen her in a few films she did recently and she sure as hell doesn't look around 50, doesn't she?
-
roman2886 — 9 years ago(December 31, 2016 04:13 PM)
She is still only 52 he won't be 53 for a long time yet she doesn't look a day over 38 52 is the new 42 middle age doesn't begin until 55 these days old age doesn't start until 75 these days she is heading towards the age where women are transitioning into the middle age look she is more stunning now to when she was in her 20s and 30s she gets more hotter with age some women are not only over hot the age of 40 plenty of women can be stunning over the age of 50 Sandy is one of them she aged better than Courtney Cox.
https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=middle age 55
https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#newwindow=1&q=old age 75yy -
kayleewheat — 9 years ago(January 07, 2017 09:48 AM)
Honestly, Sandra Bullock doesn't look older than in her late 30's. I think she could be mistaken for that sort of age. Growing old isn't what it used to be. There are a lot of women over 50 who look a lot younger than that. I first saw her in 'Miss Congeniality' when I was a child. It's safe to say she hasn't aged that much since then, which is all to her advantage!