As evidenced by all the vast majority of drunk drivers (99.999%) that never hurt anyone.
-
BlablaBlackSheep — 3 years ago(August 12, 2022 08:06 PM)
DUIs are just designed to punish poor people. A pig can claim it detects “the odour of alcohol” and hit you with a DWI and ruin your life forever, even if it was lying.
There’s nothing wrong with driving after drinking, the difference is whether you’re a ****ty driver or not. Ann Heche would have easily been sober and plowed into that house. Just like how Paul Walker killed himself and another person without drinking.
The whole drunk driving myth is propaganda. -
WarrenPeace — 3 years ago(August 13, 2022 05:32 PM)
Then how would you explain it that someone with a spotless driving record, never got into one accident her whole life, is now sideswiping cars and crashes into a tree after consuming a bunch of glasses of wine?
You honestly think she would have done the same thing on that same day had she been sober?
"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall -
-
WarrenPeace — 3 years ago(August 14, 2022 01:23 AM)
I sorta feel the way you do, actually.
That it could be an issue of, "mind over matter."
I tell ya this though.
There is no way after I get ****ed up, good and buzzed or drunk that I would try it unless it was on a safe course.
DUI is not a good idea and I really hate it when they do that and have no problem if they kill themselves when they do.
"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall -
Rocketman — 3 years ago(August 12, 2022 08:43 PM)
So… a person who is drunk and driving a car isn't drunk driving? And if I'm caught behind the wheel of a car with at least a blood alcohol level of 0.08 I'm just driving ****ty? Fuck. I guess I'm going to have to use that next time I get pulled over and they arrest me for registering a BAC of over the legal amount or failing a field sobriety test.
Throughout Heaven and Earth, I alone am the honored one. -
-
MagneticMonopole — 3 years ago(August 12, 2022 08:51 PM)
No, there's nothing subjective. A high blood alcohol level is going to impair your dexterity and judgment. This can and has been measured and is an established, uncontroversial scientific fact.
People who drive while drunk, however skilled, are utterly worthless, irresponsible assholes. End of story. -
BlablaBlackSheep — 3 years ago(August 12, 2022 09:10 PM)
Utterly ridiculous lmao. A man weighing 300 lbs could have a BAC of .5 and not be impaired at all.
It’s completely subjective from person to person. This “scientific fact” you’re talking about is just pseudo-science peddled by charlatans.
There are plenty of examples of people actually having improved dexterity and judgement after drinking, you know nothing.
By your logic, someone would have a drink and then immediately crash their car into a brick wall without even leaving their driveway. You’d have to be congenitally retarded to do that, it has nothing to do with alcohol, -
MagneticMonopole — 3 years ago(August 13, 2022 11:28 AM)
This “scientific fact” you’re talking about is just pseudo-science peddled by charlatans.
Good, then you should be able to cite the studies showing impairment of performance by blood alcohol level and articulate exactly what mistakes they made.
Why do both of us know for a fact that you will never, ever do this?
There are plenty of examples of people actually having improved dexterity and judgement after drinking, you know nothing.
You apparently get your science from the the
Journal of Alcoholic Delusions
.
Newsflash: "examples" are nothing more than anecdotal "evidence" and are never, ever considered valid from the perspective of scientific discipline. If you knew this fundamental principle of the scientific method you wouldn't have made such an absurd statement. -
BlablaBlackSheep — 3 years ago(August 13, 2022 03:36 PM)
Lmao, the burden of proof is not on me faget. Besides which, you’re just building a strawman, which you can go burn somewhere else. No one here said the scientific studies made any “mistakes.” What is apparent is that the results of those studies are distorted and abused by frauds to push “drunk driving” propaganda that ruins people lives for having a beer.
Perhaps I should repeat myself again for your smooth brain, since you seem unable to read: my point is that in reality,
99.999% of drunk drivers do not crash or kill someone else.
Go ahead, prove me wrong. Why do both of us know for a fact you’ll never do this?
FYI this isn’t a science class. I do not have to follow the scientific method to prove to you that I will not crash into a building and explode after having a beer. It’s just common ****ing sense. You do not need to over-analyze and research something basic like that. The fact is that only morons crash their cars after having a few drinks (in which case they would have crashed sober anyway), or people with health problems.
Stop lumping bad drunk drivers in with the good ones. That’s another logical fallacy on your part. -
MagneticMonopole — 3 years ago(August 14, 2022 12:09 PM)
Lmao, the burden of proof is not on me faget.
Actually, the burden of proof is on you.
What is apparent is that the results of those studies are distorted and abused by frauds to push “drunk driving” propaganda that ruins people lives for having a beer.
If this were actually "apparent", you would be able to articulate the details of those studies and show exactly how they have been dishonestly manipulated. You can't. You are just making **** up.
And let's be clear, here: no one's life has been ruined for "having a beer".
my point is that in reality, 99.999% of drunk drivers do not crash or kill someone else. Go ahead, prove me wrong. Why do both of us know for a fact you’ll never do this?
We both know you pulled this information out of your dumb, ignorant, alcoholic ass. When you are ready to grow up and deal with reality, find me real, objective, verifiable statistics from reliable sources and then we can talk.
I do not have to follow the scientific method to prove to you that I will not crash into a building and explode after having a beer.
No one is talking about anecdotal examples involving a single beer. What we are talking about is the objective reality that high blood alcohol levels lead to impairment which endangers lives.
It is a social good that idiots who drive drunk can get arrested and punished. End of story.
Always wondered that too. Silly brits and their daft phrases. )