Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Explain why isn't her topless at 16 considered Child Porn…But?

Explain why isn't her topless at 16 considered Child Porn…But?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
46 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #37

    elaphe-1 — 11 years ago(April 11, 2014 06:49 PM)

    It's been awhile since I've seen the film, but if I recall correctly Birch was topless but there was no sex scene. How is being topless an indecent act? And pornography has nothing to do with nudity; it has to do with sexual arousal. She would have to have been engaged in some sort of sexual activity for it to have been considered pornography.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #38

      BulmaPunkRocker — 10 years ago(June 25, 2015 10:12 PM)

      When you are a minor and an adult has sex with you it is considered rape.
      Really? If you have 17 and your boyfriend 18, being 18 the age of "full consent" and 16 the age of consent, isn't it "statutory rape" or something?
      I'm not familiar with USA laws, I know you people can drive a car at 16 but cannot have a beer until 21, I don't understand, but wathever.
      It's not related with the movie, but with the sentence I quoted. If an underage person, who is in age of consent (let's say 16), have sex with an adult (let's say 19), isn't that "statutory rape" and not "rape"? I thought that rape was when the victim was a minor under the age of consent and/or the victim didn't consent at all.
      Please excuse my terrible redaction, english is not my native language
      IMDb = Catch-22

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #39

        Hollywoodshack — 12 years ago(March 25, 2014 11:00 AM)

        A film isn't sent to each viewer who can send a message back about it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #40

          jet_85225 — 11 years ago(May 15, 2014 12:41 PM)

          There is a difference between nudity and pornography.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote on last edited by
            #41

            IMDb User

            This message has been deleted.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote on last edited by
              #42

              wrlord2001 — 11 years ago(July 23, 2014 10:20 AM)

              Toplessness is not porn. Grow the beep up.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote on last edited by
                #43

                lazarillo — 11 years ago(July 27, 2014 11:03 AM)

                Toplessness and nudity are not porn and 16 (or 17) is not a child.
                Maybe most men should just ADMIT that they are attracted to 16 and 17-year-old girls. They were as teenagers and they will be as old men. That doesn't make you "pedophile" because pedophiles are attracted to CHILDREN, not fully developed older teens. It also doesn't make you a sex offender unless, as an adult, you show up at their house when their parents are away with beer and condoms. I don't mind seeing pretty women naked, but that doesn't mean I go peek in windows. Same thing with finding underage girls somewhat attractive.
                What's really stupid is they never have girls this young do nude scenes in American movies anymore anyway ("American Beauty" was last one I remember). So are you trying to "protect" women who are least 30 at this point? How many adult men saw an underage girl naked (or had sex with her) when they themselves were teenagers 15, 20, or 30 years ago? Are you going give us all a lobotomy to remove these images of "child porn"?
                The irony is Thora Birch is a very underrated actress and cute as hell TODAY. Why all the focus on an underage nude scene she did 15 years ago? Will the real perverts please stand up?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #44

                  ngdvd — 10 years ago(June 24, 2015 06:49 PM)

                  Yeah, funny how no one ever complains when males go topless. Is
                  Stand by Me
                  a porn film?
                  If it's okay for young males to be topless in films then it's okay for young females to be topless in film. To believe otherwise is just sexism, simple as that.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #45

                    poem — 10 years ago(July 03, 2015 07:08 AM)

                    The sexism in your posting is that you deny the existence of differences between the genders.
                    Women have titts. Men do not. You act as if this wasnt the case.
                    You shall have no other Kates before Kate Winslet.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #46

                      thaneofglaysia — 10 years ago(July 03, 2015 07:34 AM)

                      Depends whether it is art or not. A film studio can get away with a lot more than you or I.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups