Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Real nice parenting Cindy part 2

Real nice parenting Cindy part 2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
34 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #17

    IMDb User

    This message has been deleted.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #18

      fbueller-2 — 19 years ago(September 26, 2006 03:30 AM)

      Are you saying I am tastless? I took a pic of my niece the other day she had no shirt on. She is also five. She was running around in the sprinkler.
      I don't know. Let's compare. Pay special attention to pics 1 and 3 Sin-dy had taken of her daughter. Did you pose your photos so that it appeared that the string of your niece's 2-piece bikini was about to come undone? Did you pose your niece to stand in a provocative manner so that she had her back turned to the camera but looked over her shoulder in a seductive manner with 'come f!5b4ck me' eyes? In general, did you set up full lighting and put makeup on your niece and pose her before taking your pics to make her look like she was an adult? If so, then you are as sick as Sin-dy.
      If not, then I'm sure your pics are harmless and represent a true 5-year old. Either way, you aren't planning to exploit your niece in marketing ads across the country like Sin was.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #19

        IMDb User

        This message has been deleted.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #20

          IMDb User

          This message has been deleted.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #21

            IMDb User

            This message has been deleted.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #22

              IMDb User

              This message has been deleted.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #23

                IMDb User

                This message has been deleted.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #24

                  IMDb User

                  This message has been deleted.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #25

                    Melon420 — 19 years ago(September 29, 2006 03:11 PM)

                    While ITA that the third pic was kind of off, there is nothing wrong with a 5 year old hugging her little friend or running @ the beach or eating in a bathing suit. Even with her topless, if she were just running in a sprinkler or something it wouldn't be a big deal.
                    I think with the rash of sex crimes in the world, people are looking for a scapegoat and they blame pagent moms, parents of child models, etc instead of the actual culprit, pedophiles. THEY are the ones who do these terrible things and children who model could just as easily be snatched off the street on the way home from school!
                    I think people are looking to make a big deal out of nothing. These pics were taken by a friend, not for profit or a modelling campaign. I think instead of throwing your minds in the gutter, just leave it as a little girl playing with her friends @ the beach.
                    I have tons of photos of my 5 year old in her 2 piece Tinkerbell bathing suit @ the beach, the sprinkler, etc. I'm pretty sure I have a baby picture of her toddling through a sprinkler in a diaper. Am I negligent too?
                    Melon
                    "There Is CLEARLY A Typo Here, Because You Ain't No Champion Sweetheart" Trish Stratus

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #26

                      Sweetestsixteen — 19 years ago(September 30, 2006 12:24 PM)

                      Nothing wrong with 1 and 4 in my opinion. But no2 is disturbing. I don't see why young child wear bikinis full stop, let alone string like bikinis. The topless one would have been fine if she hadn't posed like that (children go topless at that age since there's no breasts).
                      Dance?-I am! And I'm Wild And Dancing!!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #27

                        wendoid — 19 years ago(October 04, 2006 12:41 PM)

                        I think the photos are super cute.
                        My daughter has 2 really cute string bikins, she is 2. She looks adorable in them IF a peadophile gets attracted by this then he is sick.
                        She usually just wears the bottom as she has nothing to hold the top on. I don't see anything wrong with this. Those photos are tastefull! The rest of you need to CHILL OUT a little.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #28

                          fbueller-2 — 19 years ago(October 04, 2006 08:23 PM)

                          The big difference is that you are not posing your daughter in seductive poses that would appeal to a pedophile and having her wear makeup. Look, these pics weren't released in Star magazine or the Enquirer. Rather, Patsy(I mean Sin-dy) was deliberately trying to make money by selling her daughter. She's a madam and Kaya is a prosti-tot. Sick!
                          Do you not watch the news? Did you not hear about the child molestor who just executed young girls at the Amish school? It's child pornography like this that leads to such events. Your daughter is fine. But if you were to sell pics of her in her topless strong bikinis, you'd be part of the problem, too!!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #29

                            wendoid — 19 years ago(October 27, 2006 06:45 AM)

                            Man, you poeple are so freaking out over this.
                            She DID NOT sell those pics.. Her friend took them for her fashion line! They were for fun! They weren't meant for pedophiles and I really don't see how she made her daughter pose in seductive poses! She is running on the beach with her friends, and the one one where she is turned looks adorable! I guess you see what you are looking for, in my case a young girl having fun.. and sickos see what they want!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #30

                              fbueller-2 — 19 years ago(October 31, 2006 09:17 AM)

                              If there was nothing wrong with the pics, why were they pulled? You must not have kids.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #31

                                DiamondStar87 — 19 years ago(November 15, 2006 04:13 AM)

                                Because of all the fuss. Duh.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #32

                                  IMDb User

                                  This message has been deleted.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    fgadmin
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #33

                                    IMDb User

                                    This message has been deleted.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      fgadmin
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #34

                                      SCP_One_Seven_Three — 14 years ago(July 24, 2011 10:22 AM)

                                      What's with the tramp stamp on her back?
                                      That's a little disturbing. Excuse me while I wash my eyes out
                                      I get it up, I get it up in the dark, I make her feel I'm not a holy man

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0

                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups