she's not very sexy + beautiful,but she is still the first…
-
mykitty — 20 years ago(April 03, 2006 12:55 AM)
Sorry, but I do not think Kirsten Dunst is pretty at all! But that's just me. Maybe lay off the crazy pills, I think that's why you think she's "the hottest thing on the planet". She doesn't hold a candle to Cindy I can tell you that much!!!!
-
mykitty — 20 years ago(April 04, 2006 07:19 PM)
Well I guess you cannot understand funny sarcasim when you read it. I told you those crazy pills gotta go! I was just giving you a hard time is all. I was at no point yelling at you or being negative. Like you said, it was just your personal preference, as it was mine. So it worked then, because it looks like I got you paranoid! You diggin Kirsten is just dandy as far as I am concerened. And yes, she does have a lovely personality. Maybe you're the one who is taking life too seriously, at least a harmless message board anyway
-
MatchaMam — 16 years ago(January 14, 2010 03:38 AM)
Responding to a very old post but I believe this. All these celebrities are much thinner than they appear on screen or in print. To say Cindy Crawford represented any sort of "real" woman (I hate that term but you know what I mean) or was big boned or thick in any way would be completely untrue. In the context of other models, one might say she was more muscular or curvy. But I think that would only reflect how emaciated other models are in real life. Also, models during Cindy's time weren't quite as thin as they are currently. Naomi Campbell was always very strong looking and Linda Evangelista, though thin, wasn't quite "wilting" or willowy.
-
SuckingBatsVille — 18 years ago(July 19, 2007 12:32 AM)
I'd kill for her body also.
Take a look at those buns!
And the curves!
And no fat at all!
Dam it!
http://imdb.com/gallery/granitz/6277/ModelGise_Jemal_14533221_400.jpg.html?seq=21
No biggie, life is good and should be filled with positive attitude, but Kirsten is butt!!! "JK"NOT!