wow… a lot of closet racist/bigotted douchebags.
-
BruceTJenner — 10 years ago(March 16, 2016 10:55 PM)
Do you always assume someone is this hbfilmz when they show up your nonsense?
No.
You are obviously unable to deal with being shown your own nonsense. How sad.
You're still a Troll HB.
The problem I referred to was the assumption of racism. You said this assumption was backed up. Later you said this was not your position. Now go ahead and rant about "HB".
Yeah that's what I thought - in the 100 plus posts that I have made on this board - you can't show one post where I said that nominations were due solely based on racism. Nice try.
You are trolling yourself. I asked you to back up the assumption I have consistently referred to. You tried to by bringing up other threads then said that was never your position.
You think that's going to work? Consistently referred to?
You started off bitching about quotas then changed to racist nominations. Flip Flop.
Haha, your the one desperate to believe I'm someone else. I don't know why you think that makes your nonsense look better.
Yeah. Still a Troll HB.
It really is pathetic that you have to resort to assuming I'm someone else in order to feel better about yourself.
Diversity is still coming.
TROLL
http://imdb.com/user/ur6534108/boards/profile/ -
Bard_Battalion — 10 years ago(March 18, 2016 01:16 AM)
You're still a Troll HB.
So you admit your unable to deal with being shown your own nonsense? Good for you, and I'm not HB.
Yeah that's what I thought - in the 100 plus posts that I have made on this board - you can't show one post where I said that nominations were due solely based on racism. Nice try.
I provided a quote where you said the accusation is backed up. Are you really just going to ignore that?
Flip Flop.
How ironic. You said the accusation is backed up. You then failed to provide said back up. Then you said this was never your position.
Diversity is still coming.
When did I say that was a bad thing? Oh that's right, never. But keep believing I'm against diversity if it comforts you. -
BruceTJenner — 10 years ago(March 18, 2016 01:06 PM)
So you admit your unable to deal with being shown your own nonsense?
No.
Good for you,
Thank you. I'm glad you admit defeat - again.
and I'm not HB.
Yes you are.
I provided a quote where you said the accusation is backed up. Are you really just going to ignore that?
More lies.
How ironic. You said the accusation is backed up.
Nope.
You then failed to provide said back up.
Yawn.
More deflection from you.
Still waiting for you to
back up your position on these:
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253099820?d=latest&t=20160228204217#latest
BTW you're not going to run from the questions I asked you in my pb68revious posts. Do you now concede that genetics plays one of the many factors in sports? Do you now concede that black lead actors can make money internationally? Do you now concede that minorities make up almost 50% of the box office revenue? Do you now concede that whites are overrepresented based on their spending and demographics? Do you now conceded that you have NO facts to prove that a black bond would not succeed internationally?
And this:
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253120773?d=253291886#253291886
Also, you never answered what your opinions are on white people (like yourself) who bitch, moan, and cry about this issue considering they are overrepresented? Are they bigger "cry-babes" than blacks?
^^^Ready to give us a answer?
Then you said this was never your position.
Diversity for casting and academy is my position.
When did I say that was a bad thing? Oh that's right, never.
Good we are both for diversity
I'm glad that I was able to make you see the error in your ways and that you have seen the light, hb
But keep believing I'm against diversity if it comforts you
Diversity is still coming
TROLL
http://imdb.com/user/ur6534108/boards/profile/ -
Bard_Battalion — 10 years ago(March 18, 2016 10:48 PM)
I'm glad you admit defeat
Where did you read that?
Yes you are.
Why do you believe this?
More lies.
Wow. Here is the quote again:
Me: Not a problem for those who are comfortable making accusations and not providing anything to back them up.
You: Yes. They were backed-up.
You are either dishonest or an idiot.
Still waiting for you to
back up your position on these:
You are also delusional.
Diversity is still coming
I just told you I am for diversity and then you say diversity is coming as if I'm against it. Try to understand what is being said before you respond. -
BruceTJenner — 10 years ago(March 19, 2016 02:37 AM)
Where did you read that?
When you decided to leave hb.
You said:
Show me a study that proves that movies with non-white leading actors make anywhere near as much money as with white leading actors and I'll apologize and leave.
I showed you. You left (and deleted).
Why do you believe this?
Why would I not, hb?
Wow. Here is the quote again:
Here is my quote (to you) again:
Still waiting for you to
back up your position on these:
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253099820?d=latest&t=20160228204217#latest
BTW you're not going to run from the questions I asked you in my previous posts. Do you now concede that genetics plays one of the many factors in sports? Do you now concede that black lead actors can make money internationally? Do you now concede that minorities make up almost 50% of the box office revenue? Do you now concede that whites are overrepresented based on their spending and demographics? Do you now conceded that you have NO facts to prove that a black bond would not succeed internationally?
And this:
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253120773?d=253291886#253291886
Also, you never answered what your opinions are on white people (like yourself) who bitch, moan, and cry about this issue considering they are overrepresented? Are they bigger "cry-babes" than blacks?
^^^Ready to give us a answer?
You are either dishonest or an idiot.
Neither.
You are also delusional.
Lies.
I just told you I am for diversity and then you say diversity is coming as if I'm against it. Try to understand what is being said before you respond.
That's great, hb.
How happy are you that
Diversity is still coming.
TROLL
http://imdb.com/user/ur6534108/boards/profile/ -
Bard_Battalion — 10 years ago(March 19, 2016 11:06 PM)
I show you where you said the accusations are backed up, you say this is a lie, then I show you again, and because it finally sank in and you can't argue this fact you just ignore it and rant about HB. Anyone reading this can see how pathetic you are.
-
BruceTJenner — 10 years ago(March 19, 2016 11:42 PM)
I show you where you said the accusations are backed up, you say this is a lie, then I show you again, and because it finally sank in and you can't argue this fact you just ignore it and rant about HB. Anyone reading this can see how pathetic you are.
You're a troll. MY opinions have always been backed up. Remember I produced several separate sources to back up my positions and you produced NONE and everyone reading seen it. I never said I agreed with quotas nor ever said that nominations were based solely on racism and you can't produce one post where I've said that - you have continued to lie and deceive by telling me - what I believe in - when that has NEVER been my position. I have made my position very clear and whether people agree with me or not - they know where I stand. I'm consistent. You on the other hand have never been consistent. I pointed out how inconsistent you were the last time and yet you still continue. You started off posting in this thread because you didn't believe in quotas. I replied saying that I don't believe in quotas (for academy nomination) either. Any normal person would have been glad that I agreed with them about quotas - and moved on. But not you HB. However, you felt the need to push further because you are still distraught over the e-slapping that I gave you over a MONTH ago. Instead of quotas you found something else to bitch about and changed your argument from quotas to "racist" nominations.
Again you flip what you were originally bitching about since I agreed with you to something else because just want to argue with me OVER anything just to save your embarrassed e-face and online pride
. It's pathetic. You also claim you agree with me about more diversity which is the main issue regarding this whole thing - so what exactly are you bitching about? You're a miserable person with delusions of superiority because your real life - probably sucks.
On top of that you LIE and say that if I prove you wrong you'll apologize and leave - I prove you wrong - you deleted like a coward - leave - then come back with a second account (a month later) and try again. You have no self respect whatsoever and went back on your word - you're a clown and I will continue to treat you that way until you take your balls out your mom's purse, act like an adult and, conduct yourself accordingly.
Clown
TROLL
http://imdb.com/user/ur6534108/boards/profile/ -
Bard_Battalion — 10 years ago(March 21, 2016 12:02 AM)
MY opinions have always been backed up
Wow. So you just flat out ignore how I show you saying the accusations of racism are backed up, and how when you fail to back them up you say this was never your position. It's right there for all to see and you know it. Still you try to ignore it and rant about HB. Keep going, it's hilarious. -
BruceTJenner — 10 years ago(March 22, 2016 03:06 AM)
^^^ Figures you would take only a sentence out of my last response and ignore the bulk of the post that criticizes your irrational immature behavior. Both of your "issues" that you complained about - the quotas and racist nomib68nations - I literally agreed with you on. We are on the same page yet you still want to argue and make this about me - which proves that its not really about the issues that you're claiming - its really because you have a hard on for me.
Now a normal poster that I never have not had any previous history with would have been happy I agreed with them - left it at that and moved on - but you keep trying to prove me "wrong" about ANYTHING - even if it means flipping what you were originally mad about. It shows that for you this is not about quotas or nominations but that for you this is personal. You took the online @ss whipping I gave you - personally and are desperate to get even.
. Sad.
Look at the time- line of the posts that you responded to. I made that post on January 30th. You responded to that post (that wasn't even addressed to you btw) on February 27th - almost ONE FULL MONTH later. You mean to tell me a stranger that has never been on this board before is going to come here and specifically respond to a month old post instead of the more recent posts and specifically pick out my month old post - to take issue with . And you have the NERVE to tell this board that you're not hbfilmz?!?!? I know you hbfilmz, you know your hbfilmz, and the board knows your hbfilmz. Pathetic.
Wow. So you just flat out ignore how I show you saying the accusations of racism are backed up, and how when you fail to back them up you say this was never your position. It's right there for all to see and you know it. Still you try to ignore it and rant about HB. Keep going, it's hilarious.
Lol. You think anyone believes a word that comes out of your lying mouth? You have NO credibility. If I felt the nominations were solely based on racism I would have no problem saying it and backing it up. I've went against a whole board of trolls before and have no problem doing it again. I would have no problem taking that position and STILL mopping the floor with you. Not at ALL. And, I guarantee people reading this know that I would mop the floor with you again.
Matter of fact I could make a very strong argument that their was racism/biased/and or prejudice involved in nominations since the statistical odds of there being no POC being nominated in back to back ceremonies are something like 1 in 100,000. Hollywood has a long history of racism and stereotype so those accusations aren't going to stop the presses. However, I don't believe it was solely based on that.
You couldn't argue your way out of a paper bag. Everyone has seen how embarrassing your "debating" style is - all you do is throw out all kinds of frivolous things and assumptions - and now with the addition of this thread deceitfulness. You thinkb68 anyone including myself would backtrack for you? You're nobody clown
I stand by every word I said. Which is more than what I can say for you since you -DELETED!!!!
And guess what
Diversity is still coming.
TROLL
http://imdb.com/user/ur6534108/boards/profile/ -
Bard_Battalion — 10 years ago(March 23, 2016 01:31 AM)
I literally agreed with you
You tried to say the accusations were backed up and when you failed to back them up you said this was never your position. Now you say you alwa1c84ys agreed with me. Anyone reading this can see your flailing about.
I made that post on January 30th. You responded to that post (that wasn't even addressed to you btw) on February 27th - almost ONE FULL MONTH later.
So? People often do that here. If that's all you have as to why you believe I'm HB, you have nothing.
Matter of fact I could make a very strong argument that their was racism/biased/and or prejudice involved in nominations
I thought you were now in agreement with me on racism in nominations? -
BruceTJenner — 10 years ago(March 23, 2016 02:24 AM)
You tried to say the accusations were backed up and when you failed to back them up you said this was never your position.
Lies.
What are you mad about HB?
First you said this:
Are you therefore in favor of quotas for awards? Such awards would seem without worth to me, not to mention incredibly condescending.
I didn't say that. I said quotas for awards would be condescending.
Then dropped quotas - and changed to this:
In any case,
"diverse casting" in "Oscar caliber roles" will not satisfy those who cry racism in years there are no "diversity nominations".
Can you make up your mind?
Now you say you always agreed with me. Anyone reading this can see your flailing about.
More deflection. Since I asked this:
what exactly are you arguing about?
And You replied:
What you refer to as "diversity nominations"
But then (again) you changed to this:
When did I say that was a bad thing? Oh that's right, never. But keep believing I'm against diversity if it comforts you.
I just told you I am for diversity and then you say diversity is coming as if I'm against it. Try to understand what is being said before you respond.
So at first you had an issue but now you agree with me that diversity is a good thing which directly contracts what you said in your previous statements.
So?
So - its not good to keep changing your position in the same conversation. Are you admitting that you're still salty?
People often do that here.
No they don't.
If that's all you have as to why you believe I'm HB, you have nothing.
Another lie. Not all I have.
Lol - I see you skipped over the whole personal portion of my post.
I also said this:
Figures you would take only a sentence out of my last response and ignore the bulk of the post that criticizes your irrational immature behavior. Both of your "issues" that you complained about - the quotas and racist nominations - I literally agreed with you on. We are on the same page yet you still want to argue and make this about me - which proves that its not really about the issues that you're claiming - its really because you have a hard on for me.
Did you miss that part HB or do you think that if you don't acknowledge it - it doesn't exist?
I thought you were now in agreement with me on racism in nominations?
I thought you said you would leave?
Remember when you said this:
Show me a study that proves that movies with non-white leading actors make anywhere near as much money as with white leading actors and I'll apologize and leave.
Yet you're still here trolling.
Anyhow, Diversity is still coming
TROLL
http://imdb.com/user/ur6534108/boards/profile/ -
Bard_Battalion — 10 years ago(March 24, 2016 01:32 AM)
Lies.
Wow. Do I have to show you this again?
Me: Not a problem for those who are comfortable making accusations and not providing anything to back them up.
You:
Yes. They were backed-up.
Then:
Me: By what?
You: By people.
Me: Saying what?
You: Things.
You: I have backed it up in these threads here :
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253099820
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253120773
The problem is that no where in those threads do you provide back up for said accusations. Then later you stated:
That was never my position.
So, not lies. Truth.
First you said this:
Are you therefore in favor of quotas for awards? Such awards would seem without worth to me, not to mention incredibly condescending.
A perfectly sensible summ5b4ation.
I didn't say that. I said quotas for awards would be condescending.
When I said "I didn't say that", I was responding to your question:
Why is a diversified academy condescending towards minority winners
Then dropped quotas - and changed to this:
In any case, "diverse casting" in "Oscar caliber roles" will not satisfy those who cry racism in years there are no "diversity nominations".
Can you make up your mind?
I asked you if you wanted quotas, you said no. I then made the point that accusations of racism without proof can be made against any awards ceremony. What is it here that confuses you?
Now you say you always agreed with me. Anyone reading this can see your flailing about.
More deflection.
Deflection?
Is that what you call it when someone points out your confused statements? First you tried to say the accusations were backed up and when you failed to back them up you said this was never your position. Now you say you always agreed with me. You are all over the place, and it's there for all to see.
Since I asked this:
what exactly are you arguing about?
And You replied:
What you refer to as "diversity nominations"
Yes, and the accusations of racism in said nominations.
But then (again) you changed to this:
When did I say that was a bad thing? Oh that's right, never. But keep believing I'm against diversity if it comforts you.
I just told you I am for diversity and then you say diversity is coming as if I'm against it. Try to understand what is being said before you respond.
Why do you assume that's a "change"? It is possible to be against baseless accusations and for diversity within the industry.
No they don't.
Yes they do. You see people replying to month old posts all the time here.
Another lie. Not all I have.
Lol - I see you skipped over the whole personal portion of my post.
I also said this:
Figures you would take only a sentence out of my last response and ignore the bulk of the post that criticizes your irrational immature behavior. Both of your "issues" that you complained about - the quotas and racist nominations - I literally agreed with you on. We are on the same page yet you still want to argue and make this about me - which proves that its not really about the issues that you're claim1c84ing - its really because you have a hard on for me.
First, I skipped this because it doesn't constitute proof of anything other than your delusion I'm someone else. Second, you did not "literally" agree with me. You said the accusations were backed up, then you failed to back them up, then you pathetically tried to say this was never your position and then you said you always agreed with me. Third, if this is all you have, you still have nothing.
Yet you're still here trolling.
That's rich coming from someone who disagrees on a position, fails to back this up, then says that was never their position and then says they were always in agreement. I have had to show you your confused statements multiple times in order to drag you out of your nonsense. You are either a troll or a moron. -
BruceTJenner — 10 years ago(March 24, 2016 03:10 AM)
The problem is that no where in those threads do you provide back up for said accusations.
Lies.
You asked about racist nominations here:
You:
People are not assuming racism in the 2016 Oscar nominations? LOL.
Me:
No they are not.
^^^That was my response to your DIRECT question. I said NO. You tried it though
You posted this:
Me: By what?
You: By people.
Me: Saying what?
You: Things.
You: I have backed it up in these threads here :
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253099820
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253120773
^^^^But Wait. This post doesn't exist. The bold part was never included in the original post? I looked and do NOT see a post that resembles verbatim that sequence anywhere in this thread. The original post looked like this:
Re: wow a lot of closet racist/bigotted douchebags.
image for user BruceTJenner
by BruceTJenner
Sat Mar 12 2016 06:53:01 Flag | Edit | Reply |
IMDb member since January 2005
You: People are not assuming racism in the 2016 Oscar nominations? LOL.
Me: No they are not.
You: Saying what?
Me:Things.
You:Then you should be able to say what they are backed up by.
Me: I have backed it up in these threads here :
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253099820
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253120773
Right, hb?
^^^^^^^Why did you take out the bold part in the original and add your own?*************
Did you just get caught fraudulently inserting lines to make up that post?????
CHECKMATE !!!!!
So, not lies. Truth.
Yes. Lies and deceit. My post was broken up into three separate sections. Each one was a response to a different point. I said NO in the above to the racist nominations then you deceitfully applied my third respnse to your first question and THEN deceitfully combined two responses into one.
Exhibit A (my original post):
Re: wow a lot of closet racist/bigotted douchebags.
image for user BruceTJenner
by BruceTJenner
Sat Mar 12 2016 06:53:01 Flag | Edit | Reply |
IMDb member since January 2005
You:
People are not assuming racism in the 2016 Oscar nominations? LOL.
Me:
No they are not.
You:
Saying what?
Me:
Things.
You
Then you should be able to say what they are backed up by.
Me:
I have backed it up in these threads here :
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253099820
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253120773
Right, hb?
Exhibt B (Your post):
Re: wow a lot of closet racist/bigotted douchebags.
image for user Bard_Battalion
by Bard_Battalion
Sat Mar 12 2016 21:52:44 Flag | Reply |
IMDb member since December 2015
You quoting Me:
No they are not.
Things.
You:
How can you say peop5b4le are not making these assumptions while also backing up these non assumptions? You don't make sense.
Me:
I have backed it up
You:
You did not provide proof the 2016 Oscar nominations are down to racism.
^^^^^Caught red-handed.
You combined the lines: No they are not AND things into one line/quote to be deceitful.
When I said "I didn't say that", I was responding to your question:
But you said that you had issue with "diversity nominations". Then said you were for diversity. Do you think people don't know how to read?
asked you if you wanted quotas, you said no. I then made the point that accusations of racism without proof can be made against any awards ceremony. What is it here that confuses you?
So you admit that your issue was quotas and that you changed your position once I agreed with you. Thank you for finally admitting what the rest of us have been looking at.
Deflection?
Yes. Deflection.
Is that what you call it when someone points out your confused statements? First you tried to say the accusations were backed up an111cd when you failed to back them up you said this was never your position. Now you say you always agreed with me. You are all over the place, and it's there for all to see.
The difference is you can't show me a post where I said verbatim: I think nominations were due solely to racism. Not one post - and I've given you every opportunity to show a post where I said that verbatim. Again another fail - like your life.
Yet I can show you posts were you flip flop:
From:
Are you therefore in favor of quotas for awards? Such awards would seem without worth to me, not to mention incredibly condescending.
To this:
In any case, "diverse casting" in "Oscar caliber roles" will not satisfy those who cry racism in years there are no "diversity nominations".
From this:
What you refer to as "diversity nominations".
I know it will not satisfy those who assume racism is the cause of a lack of "diversity nominations" because its happening.
To this:
When did I say that was a bad thing? Oh that's right, never. But keep believing I'm against diversity if it comforts you.
From this:
I merely said blacks are represented enough.
To this:
Regarding black women I'm inclined to agree with you as well.
From this:
a lot less people all over the world are going to go pay to watch a black James Bond. That's just a fact. It mi -
Bard_Battalion — 10 years ago(March 24, 2016 06:24 AM)
Lies.
So you did provide back up for the accusations? But you say this is not even your position?
You asked about racist nominations here:
You:
People are not assuming racism in the 2016 Oscar nominations? LOL.
Me:
No they are not.
^^^That was my response to your DIRECT question. I said NO. You tried it though
You tried to back up the assumptions. You are confused.
This post doesn't exist.
Why do you assume I am quoting a specific post? I am quoting those lines from our conversation which display your attempt to back up the accusations.
All
of those lines are in the conversation.
None
have been invented, and
none
have been taken out of the context of you trying to back up the accusations.
Each one was a response to a different point.
Actually they were all related to the issue of racism in nominations. Try to accurately recall the conversation before you comment on it.
You combined the lines: No they are not AND things into one line/quote to be deceitful.
Those lines are shown to demonstrate how you contradict yourself. If you are not contradicting yourself here, you should be able to show this by placing those lines in a context where they are not referring to racism in nominations. Go ahead and try.
But you said that you had issue with "diversity nominations"
I said I have a problem with what you refer to as diversity nominations which I am relating to the problem of assumptions of racism. I never said I have a problem with diversity in general.
So you admit that your issue was quotas and that you changed your position once I agreed with you.
I didn't change my position, I started discussing another one.
The difference is you can't show me a post where I said verbatim: I think nominations were due solely to racism.
Here is what was said:
Me: Not a problem for those who are comfortable making accusations and not providing anything to back them up.
You:
Yes.
They were backed-up.
You then failed to back them up.
Yet I can show you posts were you flip flop:
From:
Are you therefore in favor of quotas for awards? Such awards would seem without worth to me, not to mention incredibly condescending.
To this:
In any case, "diverse casting" in "Oscar caliber roles" will not satisfy those who cry racism in years there are no "diversity nominations".
From this:
What you refer to as "diversity nominations".
I know it will not satisfy those who assume racism is the cause of a lack of "diversity nominations" because its happening.
To this:
When did I say that was a bad thing? Oh that's right, never. But keep believing I'm against diversity if it comforts you.
So every time someone raises another point you think it's a flip flop?
To this:
I never claimed black leads never make any money.
To this:
Black lead might do well in certain other countries and not so well in others.
^^^^^and that's just a few of your inconsistencies. Not counting the questions that you declined to answer:
BTW you're not going to run from the questions I asked you in my previous posts. Do you now concede that genetics plays one of the many factors in sports? Do you now concede that black lead actors can make money internationally? Do you now concede that minorities make up almost 50% of the box office revenue? Do you now concede that whites are overrepresented based on their spending and demographics? Do you now conceded that you have NO facts to prove that a black bond would not succeed internationally?
^^^^ Still waiting for those answers - WITH sources
I'm not HB you maniac.
Nice spin.
I've been referring to this all along.
First, I skipped this because it doesn't constitute proof of anything other than your delusion I'm someone else.
But you said here that this was all I had:
If that's all you have as to why you believe I'm HB, you have nothing.
Yet you now admit that it wasn't all I had
Huh? I'm saying you have nothing. And I'm repeating it. What don't you get?
Lies.
I notice you leave out how I refer to racism in nominations, how you said the accusations were backed up, how you failed to back them up and how you then said this was never your position.
That
is deceitful.
I agreed and you then starting complaining about something else.
I merely raised another issue.
More Lies.
You are incredible. Here is where you say the accusations are backed up:
Yes. They were backed-up.
Here is where you failed to back them up:
I have backed it up in these threads here :
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253099820
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253120773
Here is where you said this was never your position:
That was never my position.
If history is anything to go by, you will probably ignore all this or simply say "lies". I have lost count of how many times I have had to show you your own nonsense.
I've been calling you a troll since day one and now your using my lines against me. Get your own material.
I don't know if you are aware of this but "troll" is a commonly used term.
and guess who posted that? You guessed it - h -
BruceTJenner — 10 years ago(March 24, 2016 02:51 PM)
You tried to back up the assumptions. You are confused.
Lol - that post exists and wasn't modified.
All you can say is "you're confused". Nope not confused - it's there for people to see - it's unmodified glory.
Why do you assume I am quoting a specific post? I am quoting those lines from our conversation which display your attempt to back up the accusations. All of those lines are in the conversation. None have been invented, and none have been taken out of the context of you trying to back up the accusations
Lol- that's what I thought. You just got caught lying and now trying to weasel your way out of it. You were quoting a specific post hence why you used the "quotes" bracket and modified. Shame on you. You have to lie and cheat to debate.
You've been caught. And EVERYONE CAN SEE THAT:
You posted this:
Me: By what?
You: By people.
Me: Saying what?
You: Things.
You: I have backed it up in these threads here :
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253099820
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253120773
^^^^But Wait. This post doesn't exist. The bold part was never included in the original post? I looked and do NOT see a post that resembles verbatim that sequence anywhere in this thread. The original post looked like this:
Re: wow a lot of closet racist/bigotted douchebags.
image for user BruceTJenner
by BruceTJenner
Sat Mar 12 2016 06:53:01 Flag | Edit | Reply |
IMDb member since January 2005
You: People are not assuming racism in the 2016 Oscar nominations? LOL.
Me: No they are not.
You: Saying what?
Me:Things.
You:Then you should be able to say what they are backed up by.
Me: I have backed it up in these threads here :
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253099820
http://www.imdb.com/board/20000586/board/nest/253120773
Right, hb?
^^^^^^^Why did you take out the bold part in the original and add your own?*************
Did you just get caught fraudulently inserting lines to make up that post?????
CHECKMATE !!!!!
Actually they were all related to the issue of racism in nominations. Try to accurately recall the conversation before you comment on it.
I recall correctly. See I don't have to do anything extra like I don't know - modifying posts to "recall" conversations.
Those lines are shown to demonstrate how you contradict yourself. If you are not contradicting yourself here, you should be able to show this by placing those lines in a context where they are not referring to racism in nominations. Go ahead and try.
You just continue lying through your butter colored teeth. Combining two sentences and misquoting are things only TROLLS when they can't debate properly. But I don't expect much from someone who - modifies posts
I said I have a problem with what you refer to as diversity nominations which I am relating to the problem of assumptions of racism. I never said I have a problem with diversity in general.
Yes you did. I showed you several times. You can't modify your way out of this HB.
I didn't change my position, I started discussing another one.
Its already been proven, clown
You then failed to back them up.
You're out of gas. I wouldn't believe you if your tongue came notarized. Once you get caught modifying posts to back your delusions up nothing you say can be trusted.
So every time someone raises another point you think it's a flip flop?
No you were a flip - flip. Now you're a flip - flopping post changing loser
That's worse.
I'm not HB you maniac.
HB, why would you come back here with a second account and stoop so low as to change posts? Did you think that anyone would not notice?
Huh? I'm saying you have nothing. And I'm repeating it. What don't you get?
Lies.
It's there and I didn't need to modify it to prove it to you.
I notice you leave out how I refer to racism in nominations, how you said the accusations were backed up, how you failed to back them up and how you then said this was never your position. That is deceitful.
Already addressed - and I addressed it head on. I didn't have to make up posts to prove my point.
I merely raised another issue.
You merely raised bogus posts.
You are incredible. Here is where you say the accusations are backed up:
I know I'm pretty incredible. Alot of people would have overlooked you're trolling and modifications - but I caught onto your deceit several posts ago and with just a little rope you did it to yourself. First you self - delete now you self - destruct
Remember I told you. On your BEST day you're not as good as on my WORST.
Here is where you failed to back them up:
More Lies from the post modifier. Now you're just looking more pathetic HB. I'm starting to feel sorry for you that you believe your own delusions.
Mr. DeMille would like to know if you're ready for your close - up.
If history is anything to go by, you will probably ignore all this or simply say "lies". I have lost count of how many times I have had to show you your own nonsense.
Lies.
I don't know if you are aware of this but "troll" is a commonly