Let's Hope There Are No Skeletons In Her Closet
-
singthewee — 11 years ago(October 11, 2014 11:30 AM)
No one's blaming her for his illness, but not doing anything is one wrong move on her part, and when she finally did, it was to get half of his assets. She's a money grubbing bitch.
Close your eyes, give me your hand -
ffishpaw — 11 years ago(February 16, 2015 03:22 AM)
She did not sit on the facts. Once she was aware, she got the recording and gave it to police. I wonder what anyone would do having a celebrity husband. You receive a letter suggesting that your husband did something, should you simply divorce him right then? Based on a single letter? It would take a regular person married to a regular man a long time to put 2 and 2 together let alone someone married to a successful actor. Give the woman a break. When she finally saw what she didn't want to see and was sure, she did the right thing. She's not a pedophile nor is she someone who enabled one. She is probably a heartbroken woman who did the best she could while realizing that the man she loved is a sick human being. And she was already entitled to half of the money per california law. So anyone saying that she was looking to blackmail this sick POS has no idea what they are talking about.
-
prometheus1816 — 11 years ago(February 22, 2015 10:54 AM)
She did not sit on the facts. Once she was aware, she got the recording and gave it to police. I wonder what anyone would do having a celebrity husband. You receive a letter suggesting that your husband did something, should you simply divorce him right then? Based on a single letter? It would take a regular person married to a regular man a long time to put 2 and 2 together let alone someone married to a successful actor. Give the woman a break. When she finally saw what she didn't want to see and was sure, she did the right thing. She's not a pedophile nor is she someone who enabled one. She is probably a heartbroken woman who did the best she could while realizing that the man she loved is a sick human being. And she was already entitled to half of the money per california law. So anyone saying that she was looking to blackmail this sick POS has no idea what they are talking about.
Naive much. If that recording was in the hands of the police, it officially became evidence in a police investigation, which by the way, was closed due to the lack of evidence and the statute of limitations. That recording is now part of a record that until an arrest is made, legally cannot be released to the public. So the only one who could have released it was Faye Grant. As far as the email was concerned, it came in 2000 so she knew what was happening and only allowed this out AFTER he filed for divorce. She also knew something back when he allegedly said the comment while she was pregnant in 1989 with their daughter. That's more than putting 2 and 2 together. She only saw the need to expose him after the judge in the divorce action slapped her down six times by handing her six major setbacks in terms of the settlement. She only did what she needed to do to line her pocket. Quit seeing her as someone who did something altruistic. She didn't. You're right, she was in entitled to half of his earnings, however, she wanted more. She wanted more of his $16 million and the JUDGE handed her a loss. She was the one who leaked this and if you don't believe it, then you seriously need to learn something about the law. Again, this recording should never have seen the light of day. It was in the POLICE casefile and only would have been released upon charges being filed due to public disclosure. However, there was only one person who could have leaked it. And that person is Faye Grant. Hardly a woman to laud as some kind of saint.
Sometimes my ruminations are too confusing for someone not inside my head. -Anon -
ffishpaw — 11 years ago(February 22, 2015 10:24 PM)
Stephen Collins fanboy, much? Clearly you must have sat in court and sat in on all the goings on between these people and their lawyers to know so much. I have no interest in interacting with someone who just wants to trash someone they don't even know. My family has known both of these people since before they were married. Don't belive everything you read in the tabloids. It's sad to see this happening and to see so much get twisted. I have no wish to get into some ugly back and forth with anyone here, so let's just agree to disagree. Hope you have a fabulous day.
Tonya, the crowbar says so -
prometheus1816 — 11 years ago(February 23, 2015 02:35 AM)
No, I'm a supporter of the rule of law and clearly Grant did not follow that. I've read the published court documents in the divorce case and clearly Grant was getting on the judge's nerves. She also had no less than six lawyers. Apparently she got their nerves as well with her outrageous demands. Six of them quit, while Collins retained ONE from start to finish. And since your family knows them both so well, why not call Grant out on her hypocrisy? I sincerely doubt you or your family knows them or else you'd have known about her SIX lawyers and the reversals SHE met in terms of the divorce case.
Am I a Collins "fanboy"? No. Just hate it when spouses or soon-to-be exes play dirty. This was no different than a wife claiming her husband molested the kids just so she could gain the upper hand. Only this time the judge saw through her idiocy. Seems she shot herself in the foot in terms of getting more money out of the divorce. So let's just not agree to disagree. The writing is on the wall and this has nothing whatsoever to do with tabloids. As I said, I've seen the court records. The judge clearly saw Grant differently than apparently you do. As for trashing someone I don't know, get over yourself. I've hated Grant ever since the 80s. While I am no Collins "fanboy" I just could not see what he saw in such a vain human being. And the photos I've seen of Grant from the courtroom shows her clearly to be one egomaniac. She has snot written all over her. And that didn't change my mind from the 80s.
It was clear while she was benefiting from being able to spend his money on lavish vacations and such, she was okay to live with his 'secret'. Anyone seeing any of her interviews could see what a snoot she was. And this is something I've always believed since the 80s. So don't try to tell me it's all just tabloids. It's what I've seen myself during her interviews.
If you have such "intimate" knowledge of them, why not reveal it? Why not fill us in on this so-called knowledge of them.
Sometimes my ruminations are too confusing for someone not inside my head. -Anon -
ffishpaw — 11 years ago(February 16, 2015 03:24 AM)
She did not sit on the facts. Once she was aware, she got the recording and gave it to police. I wonder what anyone would do having a celebrity husband. You receive a letter suggesting that your husband did something, should you simply divorce him right then? Based on a single letter? It would take a regular person married to a regular man a long time to put 2 and 2 together let alone someone married to a successful actor. Give the woman a break. When she finally saw what she didn't want to see and was sure, she did the right thing. She's not a pedophile nor is she someone who enabled one. She is probably a he238artbroken woman who did the best she could while realizing that the man she loved is a sick human being. And she was already entitled to half of the money per california law. So anyone saying that she was looking to blackmail this sick POS has no idea what they are talking about.