And I have to disagree. Jolene's T'Pol is just a wonderful character! Compare her character to any other in Enterprise:
-
makbeth-1 — 17 years ago(December 02, 2008 08:19 PM)
I disagree. Ive only seen her in Enterprise and SG1.
She was awfull in Enterprise, but it wasnt so noticable alongside the rest of the "actors". Star Trek generally suits terrible actors though so it wasnt such a bad role for her. It was the horrible acting that caught my eye in an episode of SG1 and I didnt recognise her at first.
So while in some things where the standard of acting is not so high, she can pull off a decent role, however, throw her in with a bunch of hardcore actors and her efforts are cringworthy.
All of her emotions are the same, over excentuated, and ridiculous. -
Lady_Hairy_Legs — 16 years ago(May 06, 2009 09:32 AM)
NO. I have NOT noticed. I find it extremely hard to take this girl seriously. If you deem this girl as a 'good actress' you have either never actually seen one, or you find women with teenage boys bodies with 2 grapefruits sown into their bodies attractive.
With her RIDICULOUSLY pumped up lips she looks like an UGLY duck/human hybrid.
She is the one single reason I could not watch Enterprise past the first episode. -
roska-posti — 16 years ago(August 30, 2009 01:47 PM)
Lady_Hairy_Legs, you only saw one episode? I saw them all, and T'Pol's character got better and better all the time. I do admit I find her attractive, but it has very much to do with other things than just the looks. I didn't fall in love with her after seeing the first couple of episodes, and also didn't like the lip job. But she just played so wonderful character, with such emotion, I just grew on loving her.
Well, we all can't agree.
Lexa is
cute! -
Eradan — 15 years ago(April 21, 2010 04:31 PM)
I just watched Starship Troopers 3 last night and I'm with you (and Brainsnack and therealguy13). This chick couldn't act to save her life. It's especially damming given that in ST3, she was playing an officer on a starship and of course her big break was playing T'Pol on "Enterprise", ie another starship officer. If she can't even do that believably, I don't know what she's even doing in this business.
As for her looks, I suppose she's hot to guys who've been sexually imprinted by porn stars. But if you came of age before the mainstreaming of porn, females like Blalock just look kind of weird. -
Rick8684n — 14 years ago(April 03, 2012 06:55 AM)
Jolene did an adequate job of approximating Vulcan behaviour. (That's as complementary as Vulcans ever get).
She did just fine in Enterprise. I haven't seen anything else she was in though. But I have seen Starship Troopers 2 and, to be fair, that film was so bad no acter could have made it look good, so I don't expect any better from that.
Bye -
giulene — 13 years ago(November 02, 2012 05:43 AM)
however playing a role like a Vulcan doesn't help a career, lucky in the episode Impulse she did a dramatic strong performance (that I thought for a moment she was another actress and I am not the only one) showing to be a good competent actress but I noticed these roles waste the career.
-
knight_sentinel — 13 years ago(January 01, 2013 07:58 AM)
She didn't work much before "Star Trek: Enterprise" but if you look at this iMDb link of the people born the same year as she was she has a lot of stiff competition among the females in the list, they list the most popular actors first but Kate Winslet, Marion Cotillard, Charlize Theron, Anjelina Jolie and Milla Jovovich are the top five female actors.
http://imdb.to/UG9FdC
SAG says they have 120,000 actors the department labor stated in 2008 60,000 SAG actors got work. She has a lot of competition. The first four they have listed for the females as it is currently since the list changes have all won or been nominated for Oscars, Golden Globes and SAG awards.
It's not just looks and talent but a consistency in work, even if an actor is in a bad film they can still give a good performance. The first four women IMDb gas listed as being born in 1975 are very consistent in their roles even when the projects aren't that great.
I had never seen anything Ms. Blalock had been in before "ST: Enterprise" and I saw her after that series was over on "Stargate"b68 and "Legend of the Seeker".
Her husband is very successful I just saw his name in the news yesterday because of what's going on with his company Live Nation. She may not want to work as often since she has a small child and her husband does well.
Someone on this thread mentioned she did Playboy I have never looked for any pictures of her but if they were before she did "ST: Enterprise" that would be interesting since the guy she eventually married use to be her booking agent for jobs, I think they started a few years later after he had left the company that was representing her at the time.
Movies will make you famous; Television will make you rich; But theatre will make you good. -
giulene — 13 years ago(January 02, 2013 09:52 AM)
120,000 actors and 60,000 got work! I can imagine what could be:16d0 a fight! and obviously those who has friends in high places will win.
Michael Douglas said years ago there is too much favoritism in Hollywood and there are too much talented actors/actress who can't go on.
Jolene in 2002 did a photoreport in Playboy for a fashion house.
Now she has 2 sons. -
knight_sentinel — 13 years ago(January 02, 2013 10:53 AM)
Sometimes knowing people helps but an actor will still need to have talent in the long run.
I have several friends who are actors and only one of them works consistently she doesn't know a lot of people but I've noticed she networks better, she goes to the parties and mingles with the right people, people who are good at networking always do better in any profession.
Some people don't audition well or handle the rejection very well if they don't get a part. They can be the pretty girl in their home town but then they go to Hollywood or New York and see hundreds of pretty women with a lot of talent besides just looking pretty.
I've noticed there are sites now where up and coming actors have started putting up their demo reels, IMDb has also started letting them post demo reels, from the ones I've seen some of them might have a future and others may need to have a back up plan.
One of my friends figured out she wasn't going to survive as an actor and has become a successful artists and writer. She was always saying it seemed like they were bringing busloads of pretty girls 24/7 when she went on auditions.
In regards to Michael Douglas his last name helped him early on but he carved out a name for himself, Michael Douglas has two other brothers who aren't as well known, I've seen the offspring of other famous actors not make it. His ex-room mate Danny DeVito said in an interview that Mr. Douglas like his father was good at getting studios to back his projects as well as raise his own financing, that's not something everyone can do.
That is a high unemployment number, but it explains why the same people are always popping in films and television series.
Movies will make you famous; Television will make you rich; But theatre will make you good. -
giulene — 13 years ago(January 02, 2013 12:41 PM)
You are very kind, thanks for explanations, however I think that Angelina Jolie and so on are talented actresses but not the "non plus ultra" among thousands and thousands actresses, they have been helped in some way. Yes there is a stiff competition for newcomers even if talented.
Obviously, talking about Jolene Blalock, I refer back 10 years ago, when she was younger not today she is 37, I am doubtful she could get a good job now.
After many years, hearing her old interviews, looking here and there and above all reading between the lines I feel she never got on well with Hollywood politics.