There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty…
-
gardensplus-215-604903 — 10 years ago(June 12, 2015 04:01 PM)
She was fine in Nanny mcphee. So has your argument changed that because its a childrens film its somehow not worthy. Presumably Mary poppins is also rubbish in your book, or does it hold pleasant childhood memories and is therefore acceptable. Oh and of course julie andrews isnt jewish is she.
As a previous poster said " the honourable woman " is a238 brilliant performance. It's 4 hrs plus of dialogue heavy drama, with very few explosions, or gratuitous nudity so I doubt it's to your taste. -
elrando — 11 years ago(February 06, 2015 08:36 AM)
Dude, do you really think that the problem with actresses right now is that they're not pretty enough? Are you kidding me? Every actress has to look like a supermodel in order to make it. The real problem is that theirs not enough down to earth looking actresses. Do you think that Sissy Spacek or Shelly Duvall could've made it in todays Hollywood climate?
-
rascal67 — 10 years ago(May 28, 2015 01:17 AM)
cause she's ugly and oddly self-satisfied, which makes her plainly repulsive.
She is 'average' looking, not 'ugly'. I think her face, is quite pleasant. As for her acting talent, don't really know; but she does have an Oscar nomination under her belt.