Hot or Not?
-
tgrrrsss — 15 years ago(June 30, 2010 01:55 PM)
She's hot for me, but has improved as she's got older, she has that certain sparkle that isn't about conventional beauty, and it's the reason she got a breakthrough, as well as being a good actress - which she is, she has a look which enables her to play a variewty of roles, the indefianable something a casting director saw when she got her big break
-
conductor71 — 13 years ago(September 23, 2012 04:29 PM)
I read the comments by
mike-1828
about collagen implants and didn't see any justification for that. Then I came across the following photo of her and it has left me a bit less sure. I don't know when it was taken or what she was appearing in at the time- does anyone know? Personally I don't like her look in this one:
http://www.celebs101.com/image-48961661Jemima+Rooper+Picture+Galle ry.html
However, I agree with all the following comments about her:
Hedgehog84
(
"she has something about her, lik2000e she has a glow or something"
);
linzc100
(
"she's a[n] odd one to be honest not conventionally pretty but she is pretty"
);
Happy Daiz
(
"She's not a conventional beauty at all but she is very attractive and alluring"
);
marieebloomfield
(
"She has this sexy confidence about her"
);
Lopsided55
(
"She has that petite yet curvy thing I love"
);
Wdlee
(
"Thought she was fantastic in Lost in Austen, and has an attractive yet unique look"
) and finally
tgrrrsss
(
"plenty of sex appeal and desirability - partly the girl next door thing over and above outright obvious beauty radiates charisma"
).
I loved her as
Amanda Price
so it is only fitting to include a link to a photo of her in the arms of her beloved Mr Darcy (dig that wonderful jaw line!):
http://www.screenrush.co.uk/stars/star-127612/photos-publicity/detail/ ?cmediafile=18988945
There are lots of other great photos from
Lost in Austen
on that website too.
It's not really fair that there are 106 photos on IMDb for Gemma Arterton and only one for Jemima, so here's a link to some more of Jemima that were mainly taken at celeb bashes by the look of it:
http://www.spokeo.com/Jemima+Rooper+1/Apr+05+2012+Other+Photos -
mac_alain — 12 years ago(December 01, 2013 02:08 PM)
http://www.spokeo.com/Jemima+Rooper+1/Apr+05+2012+Other+Photos
Those pictures show just how versatile her looks are. Always a good thing for an actor.
Her striking looks make her h
t enough for me.
Loved her in "Atlantis". Go Jemima. -
conductor71 — 12 years ago(December 03, 2013 04:57 AM)
Yes there are some good photos there, thanks. However, I must be honest that her recent appearance in
Atlantis
didn't do anything for me- it looked like they dressed her in an old potato sack, which was very unflattering. Now compare this to
Rome
(BBC/HBO, 2005):
http://www.imdb.com/board/10384766/combined
Polly Walker was just a total goddess in that. Was it just the Roman world that was so sexy or could they have done something similar for Atlantis too? I don't think Atlantis is going to do for Jemima what Rome did for Polly, which is a great shame. It looks like they deliberately toned down Atlantis for a pre-watershed audience. Presumably they can get far greater worldwide TV sales that way, but personally I lost interest after the first few episodes. The lack of any believable sexual tension between Jemima as Medusa and co-star Mark Addy as Hercules (her supposed romantic interest) was a major factor, although I don't blame either of the actors. Jemima proved in
Lost in Austen
that she is most certainly capable of sexual tension in a romantic lead role if she is just given the right part. This wasn't it as far as I was concerned. -