Just for the Record
-
i
b68
amcage187 — 12 years ago(May 11, 2013 10:34 PM)I agree 100% with you
This all comes down to his looks IMHO He is a large not so good looking man that works with children. Well you know what, that describes a lot of teachers, clergy, and scout leaders. You let you kids be supervised by them even though pedophila is rampart I'm those feilds.
Also Dan is a rich, successful guy in Hollywood. If he had done what you think there would be a legit story somewhere of someone trying to get money off him, even if they were lying about it, and it was proven a lie there would be evidence of a accusation.
Look at Michael Jackson, dude was beloved and the beep still came out. -
mmmonsterfan — 12 years ago(August 17, 2013 03:23 AM)
You're giving parents too much credit. I'm sure some would be perfectly content with their children being harmed as long as said child keeps making money they probably can't even touch because they're underage.
-
Chris_MacGuffin — 11 years ago(August 25, 2014 06:24 PM)
It's funny this was made before the Jerry Sandusky scandal broke. You know the fact he has a wife doesn't mean he doesn't abuse young stars. Now there's no proof and I'm not going to blindly accuse someone of being a pedophile if they're not, but the fact he has a wife makes no difference.