Whedon vs. Abrams
-
chrystalr-906-994524 — 12 years ago(September 30, 2013 12:08 AM)
Actually, then I am high too. Fringe was interesting, but it could have been both written and directed a whole lot better.
If you wish to be moved: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TBd-UCwVAY&feature=share -
puirt-a-beul — 9 years ago(June 06, 2016 05:49 AM)
Thank you
, chrystalr, that makes me feel a whole lot better about my own response.
I've only recently watched
Fringe
, on the urging of friends, and I thought it started out well, but rapidly got more tenuous. Abrams makes much of claiming that he's story-driven, but
Fringe
had all the hallmarks of being a "what can we do next?" show, dragged out for the sake of longevity rather than because that's what the story needed. I found the last season a bit of a chore to watch; it's a pity for a show to finish that way.
You might very well think that. I couldn't possibly comment. -
aleusong3 — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 06:22 PM)
The problem was that Abrams was only in charge of season 1 which in itself was a different se111cries from what all the other seasons would be like. I've watched all five seasons though and it was very good from beginning to end even though season 1 sorta created a disconnect.
-
thefinalword — 11 years ago(August 22, 2014 12:28 PM)
Joss writes cheesy little tv sitcom bickerings in my opinion. He should have stayed in Tv Land instead of taking a wonderful set of characters like the Avengers and turning it into a whining argument. I guess Whedon is the better writer because he has had more succe2000ss. But if The Avengers is any sign, I probably wouldn't be able to stand any of his characters or plots.
-
asquadrilli — 11 years ago(March 30, 2015 09:59 AM)
Totally agree.. seeing Whedon doing age of ultron made me sad. As much as I'm happy avengers finally got a film.. and it did have its moments.. it was just too cheesy. Give the audience some credit, man.. you know?
-
flickfix — 10 years ago(April 17, 2015 07:37 AM)
You can't compare the two. They are vastly different. J.J. excels in visuals. Far, far, far better than Joss. But Joss's writing is better. Both aren't very good writers though. Joss's characters are very good, but overall story arc is pretty lame.
Keep in mind J.J. still has those cliches of Kirk waking up with a woman ( or two women ) he doesn't know to show how "alpha male" he is, Spark having a relationship talk during fight, an astrophysicists showing us her boobs, Ethan's wife rescuing Ethan, those movie cliches. -
flickfix — 10 years ago(April 17, 2015 04:05 PM)
You can't compare Picasso to Monet to Warhol, can you? Or I.M. Pei to Frank Gehry to Zaha Hadid to Tadao Ando, can you? They are all different. This is arts, not sports. You can't lump them together as "basketball players" you can only lump them together as "athletes", and even so, it's still very different from sports.
-
flickfix — 10 years ago(April 17, 2015 05:27 PM)
Their style and focus is so vastly different that there's no way to compare them.
Whedon's characters feel very real and are very likable. You'd want to hang out with them and have BBQ with them. J.J.'s characters are just walking cliches. But, J.J. is good with telling stories visually, and has a better handling of grand scope. Whedon will take a grand scope and downsize it to family size, and his visuals are pretty lame.
It's like comparing orange to banana. Yeah, they are all fruits, and no one eats their skins, but they are still very different. I think all these versus mentality came from sports. I never think that way because I was never into sports and is into arts my whole life. -
shadypotential — 10 years ago(April 18, 2015 07:17 PM)
of course there is. you just did what the OP asked.
you compared their visuals and dialogues. I don't know how to make it any clearer. this has nothing to do with sports. both are directors and are at the top of their field. both write their own scripts, stay in the sci fi genre, and rely on family dynamics. -
flickfix — 10 years ago(April 18, 2015 07:28 PM)
That's like saying banana is long, orange is round, banana is yellow, orange is orange. It says nothing, in comparing the two. It doesn't say banana is better or orange is better. Banana may be better for ice cream splits and orange may be better for chocolate biscuits.
-
dm442711 — 12 years ago(June 23, 2013 11:32 AM)
Thank you for your reply. While I have waited for one I recently finished dollhouse for the first time and agree that season two was great but the first season was just ok. I am now going back and watching Angel, after that I'm going to check out firefly fo5b4r the second time because during my first viewing I didn't understand what the hype was about (and I know on this page I will get crap for, but as a fan of his I'm going to give it another shot). Overall I have decided that what I really want to see, even though I know it is very very unlikely to happen) I want JJ to come up with a tv show idea and let whedon write it. I personally feel that if those two wrked together it would make for great tv.
-
Franco_Zed — 12 years ago(August 27, 2013 01:42 PM)
" I'm going to check out firefly for the second time because during my first viewing I didn't understand what the hype was about "
I am a stellar example of why a second watch is a good idea. Here's why.
My secret shame as a Whedon fan is that I did not fall in love with Firefly right away. In fact, I barely even noticed when it left the air. (After being a diehard Buffy fan for years.)
Fast forward a couple of years. I rewatched Firefly a couple of months before Serenity, and something just clicked. Now I love it.
I still believe that the show could have been better and more successful if they'd toned down a couple of elements of the show. If it had been up to me, I would have nixed the Chinese, toned down the Western stereotypes, and changed the theme song. I actually loved all 3 of these things, but I think they were significant barriers for many viewers.
All insults will be interpreted as an admission that you cannot contribute to the discussion.