abigail breslin or chloe moretz
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Abigail Breslin
darren_cfc_787 — 15 years ago(October 29, 2010 04:03 AM)
i think chloe moretz will turn into a much better actress than this young girlabigail was really good in little miss sunshine and zombieland but chloe has went from a kick ass into a vampire shes willing to do things other kids wouldnt do and i can see her becoming a great actress one day.any1 elses thoughts???
-
waltjh-1 — 15 years ago(December 13, 2010 01:43 PM)
Before you make any judgement about Abigail you should watch her Academy Award performance Little Miss Sunshine again if you have not already. Better yet look up a Hallmark masterpiece calle The Ultimate Gift.
Now if you want to see an actress that far surpasses these two, look up Jodelle Ferland -
Rob — 15 years ago(December 15, 2010 08:44 PM)
Abigail = future Kirsten Dunst
Chloe = future Scarlett Johannson
Both are good at what they do, but they have their distinct acting styles. And they both need to watch their backs Elle Fanning's starting to make her move
-
Jbrown4124 — 14 years ago(September 28, 2011 02:31 PM)
Abigail = future Kirsten Dunst
Chloe = future Scarlett Johannson
Those are not good outlooks for either, Neither Scarlett or Kirsten have impressed me (I will say Dunst was good in "Crazy/Beautiful" and Scarlett was Okay in a "love song for bobby long"). I agree with you about Elle fanning though I would give her the highest ceiling of the three based on your assessment. -
TooPrettyInPink — 14 years ago(February 29, 2012 12:42 AM)
Awesome comparisons! Of course, they're not going to turn out exactly like their older counterparts, but I have a feeling Chloe will be doing indie movies similar to what Scarlett did before she became a "movie star."
-
paulfitzpa — 11 years ago(November 07, 2014 04:14 PM)
Abigail = future Kirsten Dunst
Chloe = future Scarlett Johannson
Both have had huge careers, so that's a compliment I suspect. I think Abigail is more talented than Dunst though. Dunst has ruined a few films for me.
Both Abigail and Chloe have more acting experience than many actors twice their age. That is worth a lot. -
Ammarsaqib — 15 years ago(January 23, 2011 09:37 AM)
all though i prefer abigail as an actress but u cant argue that chloe has made very promising roles for a more mature career
chloe is going more towards jodie foster and natalie portmen route
i still remember "leon" made the same buzz for natalie as "kick ass" did for chloe
but miss breslin is also very good actress but she is a bit too traditional,she looksb68 to be the next "meryl streep" to me
ABS -
PimpSmackersGOM — 15 years ago(February 22, 2011 07:17 AM)
I like them both but I think the main difference between the two is that Abigail goes more for "cutesy" type roles. Even in the R rated Little Miss Sunshine, she played the adorable little girl role. Chloe has two upcoming movies called The Fields and Hick, where she plays a girl who gets murdered by a serial killer in one and a girl who gets raped in the other. I think it's fair to say that she's aiming for a Jodie Foster type of career with the choices she's making.
A superhero never reveals their true identity -
Ammarsaqib — 15 years ago(March 05, 2011 02:56 AM)
but the problem with chloe is if she keeps doing those kind of roles she wod be type casted,we dont want another dakota fanning,she must balance it with normal kids role or she wad be marked as a "gets killed girl"
ABS -
Jbrown4124 — 14 years ago(September 28, 2011 02:36 PM)
While I believe both will avoid the train wreck route of Ms. Lohan, I think Abigail will have a long career on screen and pretty much stay out of the tabloids. Chloe however will ave just as fruitful a screen career but somehow I get the feeling she'll be spending equal amount of time on the scandal sheet. You don't play those type of roles all the time without something of it rubbing off on you.
Agree 100 percent with what you said about Chloe, and TIFF has started it already.