This message has been deleted.
-
m_vion18-1 — 19 years ago(May 06, 2006 10:47 AM)
if mario shot proof to calm him down, then shooting him once would have been enough. After 2 shots the victim goes down. (Take it from someone who watched their boyfriend get murdered). shooting a person 3 or 4 times is murder. HE WANTED HIM DEAD. Mario never said proof was attacking him. This was not self defense. Any moron can see that
I have an even better idea: why not just shoot Proof's gun? That way you can disarm him w/o even hurting him! In fact, Mario should've shot Proof's gun before Proof shot his cousin this way he could've saved both men! (sarcasm intended)
When you are in a crowded club, and a drunk guy has already shot your cousin, you'll probably be PANICKING to take him down with ANY way possible. He doesn't have time to think: "if I shoot Proof in the leg and the arm, it'll knock him down but not kill him. But I can only shoot 2 times or else he'll bleed to death. Or, I could shoot him in the thigh once..wait, maybe twice. Nevermind, I'll shoot him once in the leg, then go up to him to see if he's really down; if not, then I'll shoot him again in the arm, then check again to see if he's really down." A drunk guy with a gun will probably shoot anything (since he's drunk, obviously). Yet you are suggesting to shoot him aimed so precisely that he is down, unconscious, can't shoot no more, but still isn't dead? Meanwhile any second now the drunk Proof might fire his second shot, and you are still there taking your time thinking.
Another thing: under such panic, Mario probably didn't have any time to just shoot Proof once, and see if he's really down. What if the first shot missed and Proof turned around to shoot Mario? Oh right, Mario should've known that Proof was drunk and calculated that there was no way Proof would be able to turn around fast enough and aim to shoot him. Wowbig expectations. Again, he was probably PANICKING and jus5b4t shot a few times hoping that Proof would be down. -
sonyayarl — 19 years ago(May 06, 2006 10:24 PM)
I understand what your saying. but the thing is, proof was'nt shot inside the club. When the police taped the scene, they marked blood drops and bullet casings in a parking lot across the street. Meaning that 2 shootings occured. one INSIDE the club and one OUTSIDE the club. This proves that mario came after proof as he was leaving, which is why he was shot in the back and the back of the head.
-
sexybags — 19 years ago(May 08, 2006 09:36 AM)
yeah i remember watching cbs and the police saying that shell casings and drops of blood was found outside. i knew from day one that proof was shot outside. so it bugs me that the police are crediting mario as self defense. any sane person can see that this was not self defense. just goes to show that cops cannot be trusted.
-
sexybags — 19 years ago(May 08, 2006 06:08 PM)
my people and city are strong and they will not let Mario get away with out being charged with murder. Now, my opinion is this: where the hell are the weapons? why is it that mario, proof nor keith's guns were never found? That is where the proof lies; balistically. It could prove that Proofs gun never fired the fatal shot that maybe someone from afar didit's a possibility but for some reason both persons who were accused of opening fire have no weapons? Like Eminem's lawyer said: This case is far from over
