Will not hold up.
-
kurious369 — 18 years ago(November 08, 2007 11:35 PM)
Per Hannity & Colmes (11/08), Monique is suing for slander. Yeah, she was grinning ear to ear & didn't look to offended or upset during her interview. Someone had stated that while the recording was months ago, the interview was possibly more recent & basically she was somewhat emotionally over it/didn't want to give anyone the satisfaction of seeing her emotional. These were not the exact words but the same meaning. Where is she gonna get the money for a lawyer & lawsuit??? More interviews, backdoor recordings, etc..???
-
mettemarithaakon — 18 years ago(November 09, 2007 12:59 AM)
Only a seedy lawyer would take this case pro bono. PB cases are always done for those who are poor or for some other special needs.
Monique doesn't really have a solid claim, nice try honey, but um no.
I made some commen16d0ts about this in the Dog the Bounter Hunter forum so check it out for my extended analysis of this joke lawsuit. -
tabascobaby — 18 years ago(November 09, 2007 06:07 AM)
the thing is he didnt go and say this stuff to the public, he was talking to his son (it doesnt make it right 16d0to say what he did say), but he thought it was a private discussion. His son recorded it and then released it, and lets face it, some parents just dont like their childs choice in a partner, and sometimes they will say anything to make their kid see why that person is a bad choice. So unless every person out there is gonna sue the parent of their partner this has no standing, it wasnt done to hurt her, or even said so that she could hear. He has apologized at length, his show has gone off the air, HIS reputation has been ruined, and most likely his relationship with his son is even more strained. He has been punished, the lawsuit is a way for that girl to get more time, yes she was wronged, and it is HORRIBLE what he said, and i am not condoning it at all, but he has been punished, and it seems like he is being punished worse than people who go on stage and say the same thing if not worse. dog realizes he made a mistake, and he will have to live with that mistake for the rest of his life, this called attention to a problem he may have, but the lawsuit most likely wont work.
-
tabascobaby — 18 years ago(November 09, 2007 06:20 AM)
but see you cant say that, we dont know with any certainty what has transpired, and honestly Michael Richards seemed to get a slap on the wrist, his show wasnt taken off the air, dogs was (even reruns) It is sad what he did, but we dont know maybe he tried to apologize to both of them.. In the end it is a family matter, and they will need to take care of it as a family, we wont be privvy to what he says or any of that. and what should we do to dog according to you? How would you punish him, and if you punish him then everyone who says stuff like that even in the privacy of their own home would need the same punishment. Dog didnt do anything to HURT the girl, he was talking to HIS SON. And what makes you think he has no conscience? When will the punishment be enough? NOt only is he being put in the spot light and having people hate him and call for things to happen, but also his family is going through a living nightmare. He was wrong, he apologized, what more does he have to do?
-
rscott6942-1 — 18 years ago(November 09, 2007 08:46 AM)
What I'm curious about is why the son hasn't been brought up on charges. According to the Hawaii wiretapping laws unless it is under court order both parties have to be aware of the conversation being taped. If you want to review that please do under Hawaii.gov and search wiretap.
