The Thing 2011

[fgadmin]

Movie_Buff_Brad — 9 years ago(February 02, 2017 01:04 AM)

2/10.

[fgadmin]

The-Social-Introvert — 9 years ago(February 02, 2017 02:38 AM)

6/10 - and 3 of those points are for the end credits

[fgadmin]

masuka-fan — 9 years ago(February 02, 2017 12:20 PM)

6/10 Not bad but unnecessary.

[fgadmin]

Hannibal_Manhunter89 — 9 years ago(February 02, 2017 12:22 PM)

6/10
The Saw Is Family

[fgadmin]

Joxerlives — 9 years ago(February 02, 2017 01:07 PM)

7/10, good prequel, I like the fillings idea.

[fgadmin]

Negasonic_WoodChipper_Warhead — 9 years ago(February 02, 2017 06:24 PM)

I liked it, the prequel concept was the way to go to expand the story into another movie. But why title it "The Thing" unless you want to confuse people into thinking it's a remake? They shoulda called it "The Pre-Thing" or "The Thing Before The Thing." 8/10
That's right! You're about to be killed by a zamboni!

[fgadmin]

The-Social-Introvert — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 04:03 AM)

I have a feeling they may have wanted you to think it was a remake and then the penny drops with the end credits that show it was actually a prequel

[fgadmin]

justyourfoolife79 — 9 years ago(February 02, 2017 06:40 PM)

This is bullshït, Mac/10

[fgadmin]

jessicafischerqueen — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 02:53 AM)

5.5 on 10
Good idea, good production values, but appallingly substandard dialogue and acting. I believe they'd have done better to hire a trained monkey to write the dialogue, and hire a crew of trained monkeys to be the actors. It's a serious suggestion- this strategy worked well for the
Planet of the Apes
franchise.

[fgadmin]

DeaconFrost666 — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 05:48 AM)

7/10
Not perfect, but entertaining. The title idea is odd but only because it not the norm.
Maybe should have been called "The First Thing"