Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Best sfx in Indian cinema so far

Best sfx in Indian cinema so far

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
7 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Indian Cinema


    Mr. Bug — 9 years ago(September 21, 2016 02:47 PM)

    For me not "Bahubaali" but the Shahrukh face modifications in "Fan". State of the art even for Hollywood. Very nice.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Mummers-Farce — 9 years ago(September 21, 2016 08:19 PM)

      That 'face' was very hard to look on. So, NO.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        IMDb User

        This message has been deleted.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Mr. Bug — 9 years ago(September 22, 2016 01:06 AM)

          Nonsense. The face was pretty transparent sfx wise. Of course it was creepy to look at (because it was so well done) and this might have also contributed to the failure, but the main reason was clearly that the fans did not want to look into that mirror for sure. Too unbearable. That Khan wanted to look into it is amazing enough. Not many superstars would.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            simian_ninja — 9 years ago(September 24, 2016 07:15 PM)

            That face was awful, there was literally no need for him to have that role. The film was shoddy in itself but could have worked if the role had been given to a hungry newcomer. It could have been that young guy's "Darr" break out if handled correctly.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              Mr. Bug — 9 years ago(October 16, 2016 12:53 AM)

              How was that face technically awful?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                Ratso_Rizzo1234 — 9 years ago(October 16, 2016 04:05 AM)

                Given the (wrinkled beat-up) look of Shahrukh Khan's face today
                in real life,
                I'd say that all his movies of the last ten years are masterpieces of sfx even by Hollywood standards.
                "
                All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie.
                " BOB DYLAN

                1 Reply Last reply
                0

                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Users
                • Groups