What would it be rated today?
-
TOMMYismyhomeboy — 19 years ago(September 12, 2006 04:47 PM)
it would be cool to see it with a pg-13 ratingthere's the intense three day hunt when rainsford sets all those traps for zaroff like the tiger spikes and the knife that flies at ivan. when zaroff is thrown out the window to the dogsit would just be more intense and funtrue to the vibe of the original story. idk lol
STUPID BUNNIES! YOU BROUGHT NO MATES! - watership down -
tiptoptyler — 19 years ago(January 13, 2007 09:36 AM)
if they did remake it, it would definately be an R rating.
they would very gruesome, with scenes in the movie that make you jump.
there would definately be profanity.
but, most likely no sex.
if they did remake it, they should stick with the original story and not put the girl in there.
i like the short story way better than how the movie was.
[well, these grass stains on my knees they won't mean a thing.] -
jic-1 — 17 years ago(January 24, 2009 08:02 PM)
In the UK, where it's required by law that DVDs are rated using the current British system, it's rated 12. That's roughly equivalent to a PG-13, although the two rating systems don't line up exactly. I'd say that about 75% of the time, a PG-13 movie will be rated 12 on UK DVD.
Movies I've Seen:
http://imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=25003655 -
alcope2000 — 14 years ago(August 09, 2011 12:49 PM)
Totaly agree despite this film having lost all its shock abiliity decades ago. And not all the violence is "implied" either. There is a back-breaking, and implalements, etc. This is PG without a doubt. It was a much stronger film in it's directors cut. It would then be a PG13.