FLAW in plot really ruins this
-
renatom1 — 11 years ago(December 27, 2014 06:04 PM)
Well, we know that that one detective had a thing for young Charlie. Maybe his wanting to get into the house to interview the family had more to do with meeting young Charlie than apprehending old Charlie. You think?
-
Ironman54 — 10 years ago(August 04, 2015 08:28 PM)
Devils Advocate: Maybe they didn't wanna spook him until they had a solid case. Bringing him in for questioning/printing/photographing and then some high $ lawyer getting him out from a temp holding cell might have been something they wanted to avoid. If they got his photo surreptitiously and a grand jury ran with it, it would have given a Judge enough to withhold bail.
-
-
jeffeastwood15 — 10 years ago(August 29, 2015 03:35 PM)
What makes even less sense is that Uncle Charlie would freak out about that article in the newspaper. Why would he think anyone in the family would think the story was about him? If there was a photo of him, yeah, but otherwise it just made no sense.
-
rsgre — 10 years ago(August 31, 2015 12:08 AM)
Thanks everyone, I like this film too, but the plot is weak in a few places. The fact that there are,conveniently, two suspects under investigation, and just because the other one ran and gets killed, Uncle Charlie is off the hook ? The other one is: how in the world would the niece explain her uncle's death on the train in a satisfactory and realistic manner without admitting the truth ? He just
"accidentally fell off the train??". Good movie though
RSGRE