Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. A metaphor for undisclosed homosexuality

A metaphor for undisclosed homosexuality

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
50 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Seconds


    Greg75 — 16 years ago(February 06, 2010 01:26 PM)

    Let's be honest : the fact that Rock Hudson stars in the film probably made me think about that in the first place, but then, thinking it over, it appeared to be quite "obvious" to me, moreover when one recalls the emotional turmoil of Hudson's character when he gets this "dead best friend" phone call. It seems to me that he might have been in love with him during college time, without having ever been able to tell him, or even been able to actually acknowledge.
    The movie being about an identity crisis, many others things regarding persona & psyche are probably evoked throughout the film, but closeted homosexuality seems like a good decyphering lead to me.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      brupey-1 — 16 years ago(February 16, 2010 10:18 PM)

      Why does everything have to relate to homosexuality?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Greg75 — 16 years ago(February 18, 2010 04:34 PM)

        Well not EVERYTHING has to relate, at any point, with homosexuality, I agree. But in the 60s it was an underlying topic in a lot of adult "clever" movies. And "Seconds" is one of them + that seemed sort of relevant to me in this film. but anyway.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Lionelt3 — 16 years ago(February 23, 2010 02:02 AM)

          What an amazing statement: "In the 60's an underlying topic in a lot of adult 'clever' movies." What on earth is an "adult clever movie?" Anyway, I couldn't disagree more. This is homosexual revisionism at it's height. And this film in particular has no homosexual subtexts: except those in your own mind, Greg75. Even the nexus of homosexual revisionism, Wikipedia, makes no mention of homosexuality in their "Seconds" entry.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            IMDb User

            This message has been deleted.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              gayspiritwarrior — 16 years ago(February 27, 2010 12:52 AM)

              Wow. Not only do you completely miss the point of ltrouillier's post, you think to make points by calling names? The denial of homosexual subtext doesn't imply, as you seem to think, some kind of intolerance of homosexuality. I'm as gay as a goose and I agree the perception of a homosexual subtext in this movie is absurd.
              And I'll bet if a man called another man a "twat" as an insult you'd be hot on your high horse condemning him. It's no prettier and no more relevant when you do it. Really, discuss all you want, but leave the namecalling and the sexist language where it belongs.
              "The value of an idea has nothing to do with the honesty of the man expressing it."Oscar Wilde

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                aratron777 — 16 years ago(March 31, 2010 08:21 PM)

                I think this movie at first is appealing, in that if you are bored with you life you can start a fresh new one. Seems great if you unhappy or bored with you life. Some middle aged people are. It is a way for people with regrets to get a second chance. But the film ultimately teaches the lesson that the grass isn't always greener and you should not take for granted the things and people in your life, because when they are gone you will miss them.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  al91206-1 — 15 years ago(March 20, 2011 07:19 PM)

                  Your right that the denial of any homosexual subtext in this movie doesn't show him as intolerant, but this line, "This is homosexual revisionism at it's height" does. As if there is some kind of conspiracy to add homosexual context when there isn't and whether you agree or disagree who cares. She was simply pointing out that a number of movies over the puritanical decade of the 50's DID have a subtext even though you and ltrouillier don't believe so. Also - if you don't like people calling each other names, kindly refrain from categorizing other's opinions as "absurd".

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    gayspiritwarrior — 15 years ago(March 21, 2011 02:33 AM)

                    On the contrary, in a discussion characterizing an opinion is fair game; that's what discussions are about, rebutting other people's posts because we disagree with them or find them incorrect or silly. I guess if you're so attached to your opinions that they feel like a part of you it might hurt when they're disproved or ridiculed; but disparaging an opinion is not a personal attack.
                    "The value of an idea has nothing to do with the honesty of the man expressing it."Oscar Wilde

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      PsychoDingo — 12 years ago(January 04, 2014 02:06 PM)

                      how gay are geese? are ganders similarly oriented?
                      They'll hang you as sure as 10 dimes will buy a dollar

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        vilafire — 9 years ago(June 14, 2016 08:42 AM)

                        Shame on you if you don't think a film can have multiple valid interpretations.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          IMDb User

                          This message has been deleted.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            rgcustomer — 15 years ago(November 26, 2010 04:34 AM)

                            "the nexus of homosexual revisionism"
                            I suppose it makes sense that a comment on one of Frankenheimer's paranoia trilogy films would contain a phrase like that.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              info-12388 — 12 years ago(March 16, 2014 06:43 AM)

                              The "nexus of homosexual revisionism"???
                              Dearie, get a grip.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                vilafire — 9 years ago(June 14, 2016 08:40 AM)

                                You sound like a homophobe who just found out his favorite movies was about homosexuals. Seconds is very obviously a take on the closet. Get over it.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  vilafire — 9 years ago(June 14, 2016 08:41 AM)

                                  I can't believe how much push back you got on this. But that was 6 years ago. I'm sure all these people have come around by now.
                                  Bwahahaha!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    fgadmin
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17

                                    IMDb User

                                    This message has been deleted.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      fgadmin
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18

                                      vilafire — 9 years ago(June 14, 2016 08:39 AM)

                                      Believe me, not everything does, but because of bigots and homophobes people had to be cagey when exploring such a 'taboo' subject.
                                      But your response says a lot about you, sir or madam. Especially when the question is very valid. It's not like he said The Flintstones is about the gay identity in the Jurassic Era.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • F Offline
                                        F Offline
                                        fgadmin
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #19

                                        suzylux-1 — 16 years ago(February 27, 2010 12:34 AM)

                                        Interesting point Greg. I haven't seen the film entirely (it's on TCM right now) But I can totally see how you could make that parallel.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F Offline
                                          F Offline
                                          fgadmin
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #20

                                          grandfunkfan — 15 years ago(October 09, 2010 05:30 PM)

                                          You haven't seen the film entirely? Then you obviously aren't discussing the movie; you're preaching about something.
                                          This movie is simply a good sci-fi thriller, probably Hudson's best movie ever.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups