Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. 1979 or 2006?

1979 or 2006?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
50 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #37

    UpperEastSider — 12 years ago(November 24, 2013 05:20 PM)

    Blah, blah, blah.
    Always be
    yourself
    Because an original is worth more than a copy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #38

      carflo — 15 years ago(January 26, 2011 10:52 PM)

      1. Once it had been done before - where is the suspense? Besides in 1979 I really had not seen anything like it. The suspense was incredible at the time. Unfortunatly, I guess I have seen too many plots and become jaded at bit.
        Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together - mass hysteria.
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #39

        kassandra227 — 13 years ago(September 15, 2012 02:36 PM)

        it's hard to compare them because in the second one you already know the caller is in the house. in the first, that was the shock moment. i thought 2006 was entertaining, but there was less suspense due to that.
        "we'll make our own tripods ours will have four legs" - Oliver, Scary Movie 4

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #40

          IMDb User

          This message has been deleted.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #41

            novastar_6 — 15 years ago(February 06, 2011 04:25 PM)

            Indeeeed, they had more balls to do horrible things in movies back then. Because as we've said, in the remake, the kids don't dieis that scary? The babysitter fights off the killer, and goes crackers in the hospital, that's not scary.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #42

              UpperEastSider — 11 years ago(March 05, 2015 07:50 PM)

              Her going "crackers" in the hospital wasn't supposed to be scary..
              When life knocks you down, roll over and look at the stars

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #43

                aspiringwriter16 — 15 years ago(March 17, 2011 01:15 AM)

                It's half and half.
                For one thing, the first twenty minutes of the original is ten times better than the remake as a whole. However, the remake at least keeps to the story and doesn't unnecessarily expand to over a decade.
                It's like, you don't even have to watch the film, just the first twenty minutes and you're done.
                Don't Judge A Book By Its Movie

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #44

                  ricky_may1 — 14 years ago(June 01, 2011 10:44 AM)

                  the 2006 film was really BORING
                  the 1979 classic is WAY better.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #45

                    jimpiscitelli — 14 years ago(July 13, 2011 10:49 AM)

                    Definitely the 1979 original. Was disappointed for the 2006 remake.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #46

                      Mithrandir-Olorin33 — 14 years ago(November 08, 2011 11:55 AM)

                      The new is better for me, their not even the same Genre of film ultimately, with the Remake the entire film is like the 1st 20 minutes of this.
                      "When the chips are down these
                      Civilized
                      people will Eat each Other"

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #47

                        IMDb User

                        This message has been deleted.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #48

                          walterkovax — 13 years ago(April 10, 2012 08:17 PM)

                          It's actually even worse than the original, if that's even possible,

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #49

                            IMDb User

                            This message has been deleted.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #50

                              jtfriday2000 — 13 years ago(June 29, 2012 06:49 PM)

                              Gimme the remake. The middle part of the original had boring filler that completely diluted the tension. The remake kept the tension throughout and stayed with the original legend. The remake was much more creative and suspense even though it had a smaller setting.
                              My sig: why do almost all movies on imdb have a "worst movie ever!" thread?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0

                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups