1979 or 2006?
-
novastar_6 — 15 years ago(February 06, 2011 04:25 PM)
Indeeeed, they had more balls to do horrible things in movies back then. Because as we've said, in the remake, the kids don't dieis that scary? The babysitter fights off the killer, and goes crackers in the hospital, that's not scary.
-
aspiringwriter16 — 15 years ago(March 17, 2011 01:15 AM)
It's half and half.
For one thing, the first twenty minutes of the original is ten times better than the remake as a whole. However, the remake at least keeps to the story and doesn't unnecessarily expand to over a decade.
It's like, you don't even have to watch the film, just the first twenty minutes and you're done.
Don't Judge A Book By Its Movie -
Mithrandir-Olorin33 — 14 years ago(November 08, 2011 11:55 AM)
The new is better for me, their not even the same Genre of film ultimately, with the Remake the entire film is like the 1st 20 minutes of this.
"When the chips are down these
Civilized
people will Eat each Other" -
jtfriday2000 — 13 years ago(June 29, 2012 06:49 PM)
Gimme the remake. The middle part of the original had boring filler that completely diluted the tension. The remake kept the tension throughout and stayed with the original legend. The remake was much more creative and suspense even though it had a smaller setting.
My sig: why do almost all movies on imdb have a "worst movie ever!" thread?