How About a "Reverse" Final Countdown?
-
kurt-2000 — 9 years ago(July 11, 2016 03:09 AM)
Tell me just how the hell do you think you know something that's hidden and covered up.?
Fortunately not all insiders are loyal to cover-ups. Extremely bad classified projects have already been exposed in American military history.
Fraking morons, I swear.
According to your many board comments directed at various people, that would include anyone who dares to disagree with the sailor. You're "fraking" consistent in that pattern behavior. -
CGSailor — 9 years ago(July 11, 2016 03:19 AM)
Fortunately not all insiders are loyal to cover-ups.
Those insiders are not insiders. They're kooks, cooking up a bs story which other morons swallow hook line and sinker because it fits what they want to believe.
Jackasses like Bob Lazar, who claims to have worked at Area 51 on reverse engineering alien spacecraft. are really nothing but deluded idiots, Lazar having done nothing more than took an electronics course at a junior college.
His stories are fiction.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water! -
kurt-2000 — 9 years ago(July 11, 2016 12:07 PM)
Those insiders are not insiders. They're kooks, cooking up a bs story which other morons swallow hook line and sinker because it fits what they want to believe.
lol Now you're claiming to know these people. No surprise there.
Jackasses like Bob Lazar
Interesting how that guy what brought up, when I made no reference to him. Back to your "alien" interests again.
No one believed Lazar, you dope. That story was put to rest in the '80's. Even the U.F.O. buffs rejected his claims.
Area 51 on reverse engineering alien spacecraft
Is that what inspired you to watch this lame film? Seems to be a favorite of yours since you're fighting with people on every thread.
Take your meds sailor.
Since you're so fascinated with Area 51 and in denial over environmental damage, I now recall the infamous lawsuit DoD fought against when Area 51 grunts were ordered to burn toxic waste in pits, and suffered fatal respiratory damage that was irreversible. Another Defense department scandal. -
CGSailor — 9 years ago(July 11, 2016 08:58 PM)
There are numerous examples of federal facilities that are kept secret and even have no-fly zones overhead.
Of course there are. But that proves NOTHING about what we are disagreeing about, Does it.
And a slight correction, Not kept secret. Simply restricted in access. the facilities are known, not secret. You're just not allowed to go there.
The Area 51 facility is the notable exception where the secrecy is so over the top that it's very existence is officially denied (until recently).
It is that very level of secrecy that spurred on morons to imagine all sorts of fanciful and ignorant conspiracy theories surrounding it.
But it proves nothing.
There are no-fly zones for many reasons. And they are not called No-fly zones. it is "restricted Airspace".
There is restricted airspace over the capitol, around the Cape Canaveral Launch Site for NASA, And many many military sites have restricted airspace for all manner of reasons.
None of which prove, or in any way gives credence to any of your conspiracy beep
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water! -
kurt-2000 — 9 years ago(July 12, 2016 03:19 AM)
And a slight correction, Not kept secret. Simply restricted in access. the facilities are known, not secret. You're just not allowed to go there.
Area 51 is not the only federal facility the public doesn't know about. There are others.
It is that very level of secrecy that spurred on morons to imagine all sorts of fanciful and ignorant conspiracy theories surrounding it.
But it proves nothing.
There is a question as to what goes on in federal facilities when there's a small amount of civilian oversight. The workers at Area 51 that lost their lives from burning pits weren't going to get any assistance, before the lawsuit.
And they are not called No-fly zones. it is "restricted Airspace".
From the civilian perspective, they are: 'You're in deep trouble if you go near near that airspace'. That comes across as very "no-fly" from the civilian perspective.
There is restricted airspace over the capitol, around the Cape Canaveral Launch Site for NASA
Those are understandable restrictions since we know what goes on in those places and people like me agree with the reasons. Highly classified facilities with no explanation bring into question if even presidents know what's going on. The George H.W. Bush administration might have been the last administration to be given accurate explanations. Cheney as well under "W"s administration. There is some question as to whether Democratic party presidents where left out of the loop when it comes to classified information. -
CGSailor — 9 years ago(July 12, 2016 04:09 AM)
Area 51 is not the only federal facility the public doesn't know about. There are others.
You see? THAT right there is the conspiracy mentality.
If the public does not know about them, Then how do YOU know they exist?
FACT You Don't. You just claim it to be true with no facts or evidence.
There is some question as to whether Democratic party presidents where left out of the loop when it comes to classified information.
If Hillary wins the next election She BETTER BE LEFT OUT OF THE LOOP, or all Our secrets for national Defense will just be posted publicly for all to see.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water! -
kurt-2000 — 9 years ago(July 12, 2016 10:03 AM)
If the public does not know about them, Then how do YOU know they exist?
Some time ago, Popular Mechanics did a really great story on all federal facilities civilians can't get near in America. They pinpointed a number of locations that are off limits and the military won't comment on. Where is the civilian oversight for these facilities? Are presidents and most members of Congress briefed? We don't even know that.
FACT You Don't. You just claim it to be true with no facts or evidence.
You tell me the facts when most of these facilities aren't even claimed to be Navy facilities. You don't know either. How do we know what's going on there? It could be anything. You might not have an interest, but there are millions of Americans that do. That doesn't make me or other crazy for wanting to know. I support accountability even if you don't, so continue the name calling. I don't care.
If Hillary wins the next election She BETTER BE LEFT OUT OF THE LOOP, or all Our secrets for national Defense will just be posted publicly for all to see.
You and I sharply disagree on that, and I don't even like Hillary. Hillary will be DoD's best lap dog ever. Former 'Goldwater Girl' to the bitter end.
But my candidate who lost, Bernie Sanders, would have blown the whistle. So you're safe sailor. You should be happy.
https://www.facebook.com/thefreethoughtprojectcom/videos/1768289740057952/ -
CGSailor — 9 years ago(July 11, 2016 12:03 AM)
Your insecurity problems regarding this matter is truly bizarre. What are you afraid of? The Navy is in no danger of losing this project or any of their other highly classified research programs. They've got the Congress giving them anything they want. A very sweet arrangement for your (former?) employer. And we continue to count the dead sea mammals washed up on the shore.
There is no insecurity on my part. That is a false assertion on your part. And trust me Congress is FAR from giving us everthing we need much less everything we want. Cutbacks and downsizing is the order of the day and we are very hard pressed to perform the missions required of us with dwindling assets and manpower.
Lately we have taken to canibalizing museum aircraft to keep current aircraft flying. And you think Congress gives us everything we want LOL in your dreams.
And there is nothing bizarre about my reactions. I am countering ignorance with facts.
But I shouldn't be an ingrate here. You did confess the impact of sonar on sea mammals, so I should be grateful for that much honesty. Other Navy guys wouldn't have even gone that far.
Dont even try to falsely insinuate that I confessed and agreed to your bullsh!t assertions and claims.
I.
Do.
Not.
Any and every one in the Navy agrees and will admit to the known fact that Active Sonar (Not passive Sonar) can harm and even kill nearby animals in the water.
Even a human.
When a sonar pulse goes out, it is so powerful that water around the dome itself actually boils. It can stun and even kill anything nearby.
But this is for animals NEARBY within a few hundred yards.
What the Navy and including myself refuses to admit to because there is nor concrete evidence of it, only anecdootal claims is that unrelated whale and dolphin beachings are a reault of sonar use.
It is possible there may be a connection. but so far there has been no evidence found of it.
You wrongly take my statement of one thing, and misconstrue it as an admittance of something you are claiming. It is not.
Yeah, and there's nothing going on at Area 51 either. And there aren't any other classified facilities in the U.S. either, or no-fly zones. SureI get it. Just shut people down when questions are asked. That is the classic military tactic.
There is plenty going on at Area 51.
High tech and classified Aeronautical research into advanced aircraft.
Its where our steath aircraft and drones are being developed. Historically it is where programs like the SR-71, A-12 Oxcart, B-2 Spirit, U-2, F-117, etc.. were developed.
But if you are referring to alien spacecraft
again, You are a moron.
There are plenty of classified facilities all over the US.
I've gone to school at a couple of them.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water! -
kurt-2000 — 9 years ago(July 11, 2016 03:23 AM)
There is no insecurity on my part. And trust me
LOL No thank you.
And you think Congress gives us everything we want LOL in your dreams.
Defense News from last year:
"WASHINGTON The US Congress overwhelmingly passed, and President Obama signed, the $1.15 trillion omnibus spending measure that contained $572.7 billion for defense in a succession of votes in the House and Senate on Friday."
And you suggest that's not enough. More increases for next year as well.
wow
Any and every one in the Navy agrees and will admit to the known fact that Active Sonar (Not passive Sonar) can harm and even kill nearby animals in the water.
Againglad to see the confession.
There is plenty going on at Area 51.
Againthe point being for slow learning sailors, DoD only recently confessed that this facility even exists. Many other covert military facilities exist as well. Not to mention the decommissioned facilities that were exposed in the last 50 years.
But if you are referring to alien spacecraft
again, You are a moron.
Copy and post were I typed "aliens". We were discussing classified base facilities.
It's not like sailors have any interest in the Navy confronting paranormal anomalies.
Multi-dimensional vortex anyone?
There are plenty of classified facilities all over the US.
Oh the truth peeked out just a little there. -
CGSailor — 9 years ago(July 08, 2016 07:50 AM)
Answer me this
What EXACTLY is HAARP?
And just HOW is it killing sea animals?
By what mechanism, what scientific principle is it killing?
I really want to know what you think it is.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water! -
CGSailor — 9 years ago(July 09, 2016 04:55 AM)
I already have.
Every claim is just that a claim.
No evidence.
No proof
No explanation as to how.
Those with explanation are from total lunatics talking crap right out of science fiction that totally violates the laws of physics.
So yes.. I want to know what you think.
You refuse because you KNOW I will utterly shred you with actual facts and expose you for a total idiot. You've already proven it by even making the claim and by your rambling, disjointed and utterly nonsensical attempt at debating me.
HAARP is not some military weapon system.
It is not some sort of Tesla energy weapon. It sure as hell has nothing to do with active sonar as you very mistakenly tried to claim like the utter moron you are.
HAARP is a civilian PURE RESEARCH program, primarily funded and operated by multiple Universities and other scientific organizations. It does receive a large amount of military funding because the results of this pure scientific research, has military applications in LONG RANGE COMMUNICATIONS.
It is physically impossible for it to do the thing you damned conspiracy morons think it does.
You are a fraking idiot.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water! -
kurt-2000 — 9 years ago(July 09, 2016 07:48 AM)
Every claim is just that a claim.
No evidence.
No proof
No explanation as to how.
I can recall when your navy went into denial over sonar killing sea mammals.
Those with explanation are from total lunatics talking crap right out of science fiction that totally violates the laws of physics.
And that's exactly the response the navy gave to researchers questioning the danger of sonar to sea life.
HAARP is not some military weapon system.
It is not some sort of Tesla energy weapon.
I'm well aware of this, but the destructive path to sea mammals is a legit area of research. I totally understand why you want it stopped by your resorting to name calling. Totally predictable sailor.
It does receive a large amount of military funding
You know that you couldn't sweep that fact under the rug. lol
has military applications in LONG RANGE COMMUNICATIONS.
lol Yes! Exactly. bingo..
It is physically impossible for it to do the thing you damned conspiracy morons think it does.
Cause extreme pain to sea mammal hearing? I think not. -
CGSailor — 9 years ago(July 09, 2016 08:40 AM)
I can recall when your navy went into denial over sonar killing sea mammals.
I have never made any such denial. I have stated this several times and yet you keep bringing it up. Why?
Look up "strawman argument" asshat. Then stop using it.
I have always stated that Active Sonar can kill sea life. It can even kill a diver in the water which is why the system is tagged out of service if any work is to be done in the water.
And that's exactly the response the navy gave to researchers questioning the danger of sonar to sea life.
No. It is not the same. Even the Navy acknowedges that a blast of Active Sonar can stun, even kill sea life.
It fits perfectly with the laws of physics and all Navy does NOT deny this.
What the Navy does deny is claims of sonar being responsible to far removed and unconnected cases of Dolphin/Whale beaching. They don't even deny that it possible. Just that there is as of yet no proof. Not even non-military scientists have proven it.
I'm well aware of this, but the destructive path to sea mammals is a legit area of research. I totally understand why you want it stopped by your resorting to name calling. Totally predictable sailor.
HAARP is not researching "the destructive path to sea mammals", whatever the hell that is supposed to mean.
You are such an idiot talking out your ass, you dont even realize that HAARP has nothing to do with the ocean at all. No connection whatsoever.
Nor am I trying to stop the conversation. That is abundantly clear to anyone reading our exchanges. I have several times attempted to get you to elaborate on and explain your claim.
You have refused to do so at every turn.
You keep going off on false tangents.
You know that you couldn't sweep that fact under the rug. lol
Damn but you are such an infuriating dumb sh!t
I brought it up not because I could not hide the fact but as a lead in to explaining WHY it has military funding, but IS NOT a military project.
But leave it to your diminished mentality to assign a false motive.
lol Yes! Exactly. bingo..
You dont even know what you're bingoing
I did not just prove a point of yours.
Let me be more clear. Long range
RADIO
communication.
Radio.. not sonar
Electronic, not sound.
Cause extreme pain to sea mammal hearing? I think not.
You don't THINK. Period!
You have yet to explain the physics behind how RADIO transmissions into the high thin atmosphere on the edge of space over the Arctic to study Aurora, has anything to do with the hearing of sea mammals.
HAARP studies the interaction of the atmosphere and Aurora (Northern Lights) and how they affect radio transmissions.
It has nothing to do with the Sea, Sea Mammals, Hearing, Sonar, or any audio or acoustical sound.
You are an utter moron claiming otherwise.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water! -
kurt-2000 — 9 years ago(July 11, 2016 11:54 AM)
I have always stated that Active Sonar can kill sea life.
Againthat was the only admission you can be congratulated on. The rest of your rant is pure blather.
You are an utter moron claiming otherwise.
And you're a former navy hack, and one of the few that defends HAARP. -
kekabot — 9 years ago(July 09, 2016 12:55 PM)
Hey kurt2000,
If you'd taken a moment to look up HAARP the first time, and spelled it properly in your post, you guys probably could have avoided at least part of this argument. Frankly, there are enough problems in the world to go around, so quit being disingenuous, both of you and believe what you want. Wars have been fought because of dumb fights like this, (albeit on a much larger scale). Get over yourselves, boys. Why don't you both go do your respective "things" and quit revisiting this board, perhaps. Just a thought.