Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Really disappointed…

Really disappointed…

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
12 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Prowler


    ActionJunkie007 — 11 years ago(October 06, 2014 01:36 PM)

    I had such high hopes for The Prowler and this was my first time watching it, too, but aside from some great effects here and there, it was so "been there, done that", I just found myself sitting there waiting for it to be over with, with absolutely no scare factor whatsoever! I love the Slasher genre but aside from the get up, this had nothing new to offer. ANyone else feel the same way?
    5 out of 10
    Best Bond - Pierce Brosnan, Best Bond Movie - Die Another Day

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      DesperateHouseboy — 11 years ago(October 11, 2014 01:27 AM)

      I dont think its really fair to call this movie "by the numbers/been there done that", when it came out in 1981, when the slasher genre was just getting going. Now, if it came out today in 2014, I could totally see that, but then again, I really liked this movie, so I may be a bit biased 😉
      [bunny]

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        ActionJunkie007 — 11 years ago(October 11, 2014 10:21 AM)

        You know, I actually thought this came out mid 80s so I would have to agree with you. It's not the films fault I waited 33 years to watch it hahaha! I think I also set my expectations to high for it, which can kill alot of movies, I've always heard Savini felt this was his best work but Im a die hard maniac fan and would have to disagree
        Best Bond - Pierce Brosnan, Best Bond Movie - Die Another Day

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          shred-com — 11 years ago(October 27, 2014 01:55 AM)

          The effects are great, but I just never cared for this one. I like almost every single slasher that came out in the 80's too. I think the Scooby Doo mystery where the two leads look for clues really slows the pacing of the film down, and the killer only shows up like 3 times to bump anyone off, and one time is at the start of the film. They should've spread the bodycount out a bit more and not done 2 at a time in a span of a couple minutes each because alot of the film seems like (uninteresting) filler. The characters are kind've boring too.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            ActionJunkie007 — 11 years ago(October 30, 2014 09:44 AM)

            You summed it up perfectly. I think alot of the characters just werent interesting at all, and it does have alot of fillerI wish I could have liked it, but it just doesn't have anything else going for it(IMO) when there is a plethora of 80s slashers that do
            Best Bond - Pierce Brosnan, Best Bond Movie - Die Another Day

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              dalldorfw — 9 years ago(June 03, 2016 10:16 PM)

              Part of the problem is that you don't understand itthis is not a movie, but rather a porn-video for filler-fetishists. Now that you know, you may not like it but at least you can accept it for what it is.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                ActionJunkie007 — 9 years ago(June 06, 2016 04:06 PM)

                this is not a movie, but rather a porn-video for filler-fetishists.
                HAHAHAHA!
                Who's strangling the cat?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  dalldorfw — 9 years ago(June 07, 2016 08:27 PM)

                  Glad someone recognizes my comedic genius.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    IMDb User

                    This message has been deleted.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      simba122504 — 11 years ago(December 28, 2014 03:28 AM)

                      I finally watched this film for the first time ever and I agree with you. Nope, this not some lost gem more folks need to check out asap.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        stimpy25 — 11 years ago(March 19, 2015 05:40 PM)

                        i agree this film was HORRIBLE! i had such high hopes for it cause it looked like a good one but it was simply awful. not the worst one i've ever seen to be fair. but a horrible film either way.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          foxmulder1993 — 9 years ago(November 03, 2016 07:07 PM)

                          It's so slow! There's almost zero tension. The kills are gory and inventive for their time, but they just kinda happen and then it's more slow exposition. The Prowler himself looks pretty cool, but this movie had me nodding off.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups