Really disappointed…
-
ActionJunkie007 — 11 years ago(October 11, 2014 10:21 AM)
You know, I actually thought this came out mid 80s so I would have to agree with you. It's not the films fault I waited 33 years to watch it hahaha! I think I also set my expectations to high for it, which can kill alot of movies, I've always heard Savini felt this was his best work but Im a die hard maniac fan and would have to disagree
Best Bond - Pierce Brosnan, Best Bond Movie - Die Another Day -
shred-com — 11 years ago(October 27, 2014 01:55 AM)
The effects are great, but I just never cared for this one. I like almost every single slasher that came out in the 80's too. I think the Scooby Doo mystery where the two leads look for clues really slows the pacing of the film down, and the killer only shows up like 3 times to bump anyone off, and one time is at the start of the film. They should've spread the bodycount out a bit more and not done 2 at a time in a span of a couple minutes each because alot of the film seems like (uninteresting) filler. The characters are kind've boring too.
-
ActionJunkie007 — 11 years ago(October 30, 2014 09:44 AM)
You summed it up perfectly. I think alot of the characters just werent interesting at all, and it does have alot of fillerI wish I could have liked it, but it just doesn't have anything else going for it(IMO) when there is a plethora of 80s slashers that do
Best Bond - Pierce Brosnan, Best Bond Movie - Die Another Day -
-
foxmulder1993 — 9 years ago(November 03, 2016 07:07 PM)
It's so slow! There's almost zero tension. The kills are gory and inventive for their time, but they just kinda happen and then it's more slow exposition. The Prowler himself looks pretty cool, but this movie had me nodding off.