Cosner's best movie
-
Lana-Walker — 19 years ago(March 25, 2007 08:06 AM)
no other REALLY good films by him??? are you mad..? .. Dances With Wolves?!..Wyatt Earp?!Excellent!
..aaand, thank you, joonas157..(cant remember name spec.) but how could i forget? The Untouchables..The Bodyguard?!..Fantastic!
he is an altogether good actor
-
jmac332083 — 18 years ago(August 18, 2007 11:51 AM)
The Untouchables or Bull Durham would be Costner's best in my opinion. Or even The Guardian.
http://rockthefaultline.com/ -
kellyq12 — 18 years ago(December 14, 2007 10:28 AM)
Ha, Catma. I agree. I am not much of a Kevin Coster fan, but I love this movie. I feel like Kevin doesn't emote much. (Though he seems to be improving with age.). BUT this movie is fantastic. Love it. It seems to work with Kevin's approach to acting, because the character he is playing has to conceal his feelings.
-
soccermarti — 18 years ago(January 08, 2008 01:07 PM)
"No way out" is by far Costner's best movie. All his other movies are very forgettable. This is the only movie by him I can watch over and over again and still enjoy it. The movie is just "Cool". I've been to the restaurant overlooking the Capitol where Deffence Secretary Brice (Gene Hackman) was having lunch. Great view, great atmosphere, I recommended to everyone visiting D.C. Call in for reservations ahead of time if you want to sit on the terrace. The name of the place is Hotel Washington Sky Terrace. ph 2026385900
-
kellyq12 — 18 years ago(February 03, 2008 08:52 PM)
I used to say that No Way Out is one of the only Costner movies I like, but I swear that keeps changing latelyI recently saw The Postman for the first time. I expected it to be awful because it got bad press, but I thought it was a really good. A touch long maybe. Costner comes across as stiff on occasion (that's how I find him usually), but for the most part, he was good too. Mr. Brooks was also good.
-
jfmvp — 18 years ago(February 17, 2008 03:25 PM)
Before I get my two cents in I must note that I haven't seen "Dances With Wolves" so I can't include it in my rankings. That said, Costner's best individual roles:
1-Jim Garrison, "JFK" (1991)
2-Crash Davis, "Bull Durham" (1988)
3-Tom Farrell, "No Way Out" (1987)
4-Earl Brooks, "Mr. Brooks" (2007)
5-Eliot Ness, "The Untouchables" (1987)
Garrison is his best role because he was energetic, magnetic and sustained audience interest for over 3 1/2 hours running time. As a whole, "JFK" is an intriguing movie, but Costner is the consistent force who garners the most screen time and makes the best of the opportunity.
Crash Davis had the most life and vitality of any Costner character; Farrell was a tricky and ultimately difficult role that he did a fine job with; Brooks showed that Costner hasn't fallen off the face of the earth and displayed his ability to bring multiple dimensions to a character; and Ness is a sympathetic choice because I think "The Untouchables" is the best overall film that Costner has appeared in.
Eh, what the hellbest movies Costner has appeared in:
1-"The Untouchables"
2-"JFK"
3-"Bull Durham"
4-"Field of Dreams" (1989)
5-"No Way Out"
"That's the beauty of argumentIf you argue correctly, you're never wrong." -
hnt_dnl — 18 years ago(March 06, 2008 03:30 PM)
Well, to me, JFK is the best film that Costner has been in, but I think of that as more Oliver Stone's film than Costner's. The Untouchables is my favorite movie of Costner's. But I think his best performances are in Bull Durham and A Perfect World.
I remember when Bull Durham first came out, Costner got really high marks from the film critics, but it seemed like a lot of them were also saying that Susan Sarandon and Tim Robbins stole the movie. But I've seen the movie again recently and for me, it is all about Costner. While Sarandon and Robbins had their great moments, Costner's tone throughout the whole movie was one of sustained realism and perfect comic timing. He was never too high or too low. It was a great performance, perhaps his best. -
CheshireCatsGrin — 11 years ago(December 16, 2014 12:29 PM)
Wow, someone that rated Marnie as high as I did. I like you already lol
As for JFK, his character basically drove that film. I agree it was Stone's vehicle (aren't all of his films though?) but without a very good actor as Garrison it would have fallen on its face. This coming from someone who thought Garrison was full of crap in real life and sees so many untruths in the film. It still doesn't have a lot of plot holes however
DeeDee
"We're all mad here. I'm mad, you're mad." -
hnt_dnl — 11 years ago(December 19, 2014 03:59 PM)
Yeah, there were SO many characters in JFK that maybe I need to re-watch and focus on Costner's work a bit more. And my main reason for loving that movie is the brilliance in which Oliver Stone told the story, however inaccurate it might be. I love the editing, flashbacks, surreal quality of that film. Yet at the same time it feels like it could have happened that way. That film should have won Best Picture in 1991, not Silence of the Lambs.