Does anyone else think Die Hard 2 Is the Worst in the series!
-
Littlebitsofgaming — 13 years ago(February 26, 2013 07:44 AM)
None of the sequels match the original. But 2 is the closest.
3 was hit n' miss for me. While I enjoyed the film, the last 3rd was a let down and paved the way for what the series would end up becoming.
4&5 are both terrible Die Hard movies.
And so, God came forth and proclaimed widescreen is the best.
Sony 16:9 -
Kuato_and_George — 13 years ago(March 26, 2013 12:04 PM)
No, I think it's the one that feels like the most like the original.
I haven't seen the latest one, but 4 is my least favorite of all the one's I've seen.
For my latest movie reviews and news:
http://www.hesaidshesaidreviewsite.com/ -
enriquesinghjr — 13 years ago(April 02, 2013 02:44 AM)
The series has been declining with each movie, the ONLY thing that saves it from being a complete waste has been Bruce Willis's performance as McClane, which has also suffered a lot in the last 2 movies.
Die Hard - 10/10
Die Hard 2 - 8/10
Die Hard 3 - 7.5/10
Die Hard 4 - 6/10
Die Hard 5 - 5/10 -
donttalkaboutfightclub — 13 years ago(April 03, 2013 09:29 AM)
Saw it couple of days ago and it's really bad. They basically did the same thing again. Holly in danger, Christmas again, same journalist, another police chief who doesn't like McClane, black buddy helps McClane, in first Die Hard they launch rockets at the police, McClane is furious, here the terrorists destroy a plane full with people, again McClane furious. I have never seen the 4th one because I refuse to watch a Die Hard movie that is about some cyber beep
Die Hard
Die Hard 3
Die Hard 2 -
mike-4148 — 12 years ago(April 21, 2013 05:41 AM)
Die Hard 2 lacks the tension of the first and just goes for all-out action and violence. For me, 3 was the best sequel and it depends what mood I'm in as to whether I prefer 2 or 4. Ironically I think 4 could have been better if they'd toned up the violence and 2 if they'd toned it down - they both just lack a certain edge to them but in different ways. Still enjoy them all though.
However, not seen the latest one and by all accounts I don't feel like I'm missing much.
Die Hard - 10/10
Die Hard with a Vengeance - 8/10
Die Hard 2/Die Hard 4 - 6/10 -
gpapa1998-24-961204 — 12 years ago(June 03, 2013 03:37 PM)
I agree. I did not like this one at all. And what I did not like about it is that it was supposed to take place at Dulles airport but the airport used in the movie did not resemble Dulles at all. I am very familiar with Dulles because I have flown out of Dulles countless times, and I can tell that the movie was not filmed at Dulles. That's the main reason why I did not like this movie. Also I did not find the story interesting. The first one is the best by far.
-
noxbenton — 12 years ago(June 05, 2013 01:10 PM)
Wow..
1 & 2 are classics, love them both - 3rd one is more modern and the structure differs quite a bit from the usual - it's a very solid movie but doesn't fit the mold what die hard is all about for me - a (hero)cop just happening to be in a place where things go whacko.
Number 4 was OK in today's action movie standards but nothing compared to the first 3, the newest one in the series was utter piece of crap.
So
1/2
3
4
5
for me - and the margins aren't close at all.
