Describe the character "CATHERINE TRAMELL" in Just 1 word ?
-
jriddle73 — 4 years ago(October 07, 2021 02:55 AM)
Awesome.
"The Dig"
http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/ -
ToastedCheese — 4 years ago(October 08, 2021 01:31 AM)
She wasn't even that interesting as a character.
It was all superficial and about her looks more than anything at the time.
BI was just pure hollow sensationalism with obnoxious characters one doesn't even care about or even relate too.
Norman! What did you put in my tea? -
AnthonyRocks — 4 years ago(October 09, 2021 07:23 PM)
I disagree, I think that it is a Great Movie.
When it comes to Sharon Stone's character, I do indeed think that her character was interesting.
You spend the whole Movie (all the way until the end when we finally see that ice pick) wondering what her real deal is and if she is in fact the Killer.
When a Movie brings you in and makes you wonder like that about a character as the Movie itself is playing, that definitely shows that the character is indeed interesting. -
Donna Acacia — 4 years ago(October 09, 2021 08:03 PM)
You spend the whole Movie (all the way until the end when we finally see that ice pick) wondering what her real deal is and if she is in fact the Killer.
Basic Instinct was that rated NC-17 rating that almost got the film banned. I wasn't even supposed to watch it.
When I was able, I watched it..the first thing I admired about the plot was Catherine is revealed as the killer from the opening scene.
The rest of the movie has me confused. I saw her as the killer, all evidence pointed to her being the killer and yet I still didn't want Catherine to be the killer because she just did not fit the typical killer image when you see her in other scenes throughout the film. She never really loses her temper at all. She smiles, she doesn't seem to have any sexual problems at all. -
ToastedCheese — 4 years ago(October 10, 2021 12:58 PM)
I disagree, I think it’s a cheat of a movie.
You watch it once, come away trying to put some of the pieces together of the red herrings presented, only to realise they don’t really fit and never meant too. It’s a con of a movie that really doesn’t hold up that well on repeat viewings because it lacks sharp intelligent layers and genuine suspense.
It was largely made for shock value and is phony.
Norman! What did you put in my tea? -
ToastedCheese — 4 years ago(October 11, 2021 06:09 AM)
Yet for whom is it popular and well known? There is an over-abundance of 7.5billion A-holes on this planet. Which ones of them are you referring too?
It might be known by a small minority of people too in the bigger scheme of things, but that doesn't mean they like it either. You are going by hype only and its suckered you in.
Norman! What did you put in my tea? -
Donna Acacia — 4 years ago(October 11, 2021 04:38 AM)
That guy always pulls us into never ending arguments on purpose. This what he does, he finds a way to contradict a sociably accepted fact about a movie, then argues with you. He gets nasty and insults you.
-
ToastedCheese — 4 years ago(October 11, 2021 06:19 AM)
That guy always pulls us into never ending arguments on purpose.
This is what you do but you are in denial of it due to your lack of self-awareness.
I am asking for one to look outside the box instead of having a one track tunneled vision.
Its twerps like you that assist in perpetuating all the establishment and institutional lies and deceit on this planet.
Norman! What did you put in my tea? -
ToastedCheese — 4 years ago(October 11, 2021 10:38 AM)
Its called discussion genius and for whom is this a socially accepted fact?
What is an accepted fact around here by many, that YOU ARE a triggered insult queen of spades.
Norman! What did you put in my tea?