Pedophilia implies a relationship with a pre-pubescent minor, doesn't it? Dating/marrying a 16/17 year old does not make
-
-
DavidW1947 — 11 years ago(February 08, 2015 01:59 AM)
I'd just like to point out the misuse of the word paedophile (or pedophile) in this thread. The word describes someone who is sexually attracted to children who are pre-pubescent, that, is aged 12 years and under. A paedophile would not be interested in teenagers or either sex, certainly not anyone aged 15 or 17. I am amazed at the number of people who don't know this. It has nothing to do with any age of consent. Even if the age of consent were increased to 45, a paedophile still wouldn't be interested in a 44 year old.
A lot of confusion is caused by the authorites insisting that anyone under the age of 18 years, even if they are 17 and married, is a child, when, in fact, they are a young adult. -
Mattfinbell — 11 years ago(February 08, 2015 09:34 AM)
DavidW1947 A lot of confusion is caused by the authorites insisting that anyone under the age of 18 years, even if they are 17 and married, is a child, when, in fact, they are a young adult.
I think the law trumps your card dude