7.2 is way too low

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

Zach126 — 15 years ago(March 24, 2011 11:43 PM)

I agree. 7.2 is indeed way too low for this fine action thriller. It's one of Eastwood's very best films & probably the best film Wolfgang Peterson ever helmed. I would give it at least a 9 or 9.5 myself.
"Flying thru hyperspace ain't like dusting crops boy!"

[fgadmin]

coys77 — 14 years ago(April 29, 2011 04:35 PM)

Yeah 7.2 is ridiculous. I gave it a 9..

[fgadmin]

parker2010 — 14 years ago(May 22, 2011 03:39 PM)

I too would give this one at least a 9I still pull this one out of my DVD collection every once in a whilegreat movie

[fgadmin]

JoeSchmoe007 — 10 years ago(November 15, 2015 06:31 PM)

I agree that the movie is underrated but the best of Wolfgang Petersen's movies is easily Das Boot.

[fgadmin]

vicky_lc2001 — 11 years ago(June 13, 2014 07:40 PM)

I think 7.2 is too low as well, I have it an 8/10.

[fgadmin]

frankzappayay — 11 years ago(September 30, 2014 12:46 AM)

It is a decent film but it has so many ridiculous moments, some really bad dialogue, and too much cheese.

[fgadmin]

GreenGoblinsOckVenom86 — 11 years ago(November 04, 2014 02:56 PM)

I agree. I'd give it an 8 though. I'd like to buy it on bluray but haven't yet. I really can't say it's as good as Schindler's List which came out the same year.
When the Story Lady tells us about the naughty boy who blew up his goldfish.

[fgadmin]

thomaswilliamboner — 11 years ago(January 08, 2015 06:51 PM)

Watching it now, it's been about 10 years. It is a really good movie, should be rated higher. It has also aged well, unlike a lot of movies from The 90's. Clint Eastwood is wonderful in it, so is John Malkovich.

[fgadmin]

Melton1 — 2 months ago(January 27, 2026 01:13 AM)

It’s a superb thriller that deserves at least an 8.5
Clint vs Malkovich is a dynamite pairing