Would Monica have considered…
-
SilverLexiGirl — 9 years ago(January 02, 2017 12:27 AM)
What the hell is wrong with being attracted to financial success anyway? Is it any different than being attracted to big boobs? I mean, all people have desires and biology tells us that we're hardwired to pursue the most optimal mateBoobs tell men that a woman is reproductively healthy and financial success tells a woman that a man will support his children. Needs are needs.
The dudes who accuse women of being money hungry are often the same dudes who would pick the girl with double D's. Lol -
Painbow — 9 years ago(January 02, 2017 09:36 AM)
If you had the choice between a wealthy woman, with whom you were attracted physically, mentally, and emotionally, and with one with whom you felt the same, but wasn't wealthy, which would you choose?
That's a different thing.
What we're talking about here is an ugly wealthy person and a gorgeous poor person. Men will invariably go for looks, women for money. -
SilverLexiGirl — 9 years ago(January 02, 2017 11:33 AM)
Not me! I would go for a good looking poor man over a wealthy ugly man any day of the week. Women care about sexual attraction too! The holdup though is that many good looking men are also arrogant jerks which means women, who really don't want those arrogant jerks, have to seek out nicer, more compatible men Aka less attractive men. Then, to compensate for the men's lower attractiveness, women will also look for other qualities and perks, such as financial security.
It's really just a natural thing thing we humans do in order to choose a mate which actually has something to offer us. Otherwise why bother having a mate at all? Especially for womenWe women get stuck raising the kids, taking care of the home, and often putting off our own goals and ambitions to have a family.So if we're going to do all of that, don't we deserve the best man we can find?
Human nature. -
reaseltbim — 9 years ago(January 03, 2017 01:53 PM)
they did a study about this
men care more about attractiveness in a long-term partner, and women care more about wealth and resources.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2619439/What-women-men-REALLY-want-survey-shows-men-care-looks-women-need-partner-rich-ambitious.html
http://www.medicaldaily.com/when-it-comes-finding-love-traits-men-and-women-look-long-term-partner-vary-wildly-353302 -
cecelia_lisbon — 9 years ago(January 02, 2017 08:51 PM)
She asked if one woman may have been influenced by money, which is totally the same as saying EACH AND EVERY WOMAN ON THE PLANET is a gold digger.
I guess you have NO IDEA how enraging it is to be informed that money is an aphrodisiac to you because you're a woman. Freaking POS. -
cecelia_lisbon — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 07:33 PM)
Just to let you know, calling us that word over and over doesn't hurt us, but it does make you look horrible.
By the way, I don't get off on insulting mens' virility, but you forced my hand by being the biggest cold shower I could have imagined; I figured there must be a reason you so actively enjoy turning off women. -
cecelia_lisbon — 9 years ago(January 03, 2017 08:01 PM)
"Sorry to do this to you girls but every man knows that money is a powerful aphrodisiac for you.
Don't pretend it isn't."
There.
You are telling the universal woman, or the OP, one or the other, that she IS drawn to wealth because she's a woman, end of. No exceptions. You're also saying that EVERY MAN knows thistwo ridiculous generalizations. -
Cursedchild13 — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 07:59 AM)
Your willingness to repeatedly use the word retard to insult people is both extremely childish and disgusting. Are you really incapable of defending yourself without resorting to an insult children use that is offensive to other people?