Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Why Rachel had to be introduced to Chandler on the first episode?

Why Rachel had to be introduced to Chandler on the first episode?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
12 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Friends


    MrBobWhite — 9 years ago(September 27, 2016 09:25 PM)

    I am not a big fan of Friends.
    I really dont get all the hype and all the high ratings. This is a so so show at best.
    So maybe this was answered already but on the very first episode Monica introduces everyone to Rachel and says you remember my brother Ross right? But Ross is not the only person Rachel had met before. There is one episode in which she interacts w/ Chandler years before season 1.
    Whats up w/ that?
    If you dont like what I wrote please simply press ALT + F4!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Wildstyle26 — 9 years ago(September 27, 2016 09:30 PM)

      It's the pilot, and the characters hadn't been established yet.
      In season 3, they decided that Rachel met Chandler once before. During the flashback when Central Perk was a bar, Monica sees Rachel, and tells Chandler who she is. Then Rachel does meet him briefly, and imagines having sex with him later.
      Then after Monica and Chandler got together, they decided it'd be better if Rachel had met him at 2 Thanksgivings at Monica's house.
      Just typical sitcom inconsistencies lol

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        SeinfeldFriend — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 12:21 AM)

        Then they decide to throw the whole lot to the wind and have Chandler and Rachel make out in the college party flashback

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          TheWalkingLost — 9 years ago(September 27, 2016 10:15 PM)

          Why do you even care?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            PaulWard27 — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 04:30 AM)

            This comes up frequently. As people say, it is a typical inconsistency where the writers decide to alter back stories to suit the comedy.
            I always feel though that it can be explained away.
            Although the Rachel/Chandler meetings seem big at the time we see these flashback episodes, each meeting was very fleeting and could be easily forgotten about years later.
            Monica was shocked and surprised to see Rachel in her wedding dress at the coffee house in the pilot, she didn't necessarily have time or clarity of thinking to compute in her mind that Chandler may have met her before.Equally Chandler may not remember the earlier encounters right away.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              tsnide34 — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 01:05 PM)

              Yep. Or they could just be keeping their memories to themselves, perhaps out of embarrassment from the make-out session, or whatever other reason they might have.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                Painbow — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 03:11 PM)

                Except Ross has been obsessed with Rachel since high school and it's highly unlikely that he wouldn't discuss that with his best friend (Chandler).
                Meanwhile, Chandler losing his toe was memorable enough an event (among all the others) for Monica to know that Rachel and Chandler knew each other.
                Bottom line it was the pilot they didn't know these character backgrounds yet.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  ppllkk — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 08:28 AM)

                  MrBobWhite
                  wrote:
                  Whats up w/ that?
                  They had not written that part yet.
                  And they are not going to decline to write a scene that they want to write because of a minor contradiction with the pilot. They will always sacrifice continuity for a joke or a plot line.
                  That is the way that sitcoms work.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    Stratego — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 02:30 PM)

                    Why the long introduction about you not being a fan of the show?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      mrssutherland2013 — 9 years ago(October 01, 2016 06:40 AM)

                      I don't think the OP is that bothered having not even checked back to see the responses.
                      cArNiVaLs oF fAyGo

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        PaulWard27 — 9 years ago(October 01, 2016 07:43 AM)

                        How do you know that?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          mrssutherland2013 — 9 years ago(October 01, 2016 08:40 AM)

                          I don't. I said I don't THINK they are bothered. Perhaps they have looked at the replies. But not bothered enough to post a response is all I mean.
                          cArNiVaLs oF fAyGo

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups