4.7! surely some mistake
-
Sweet_Cookies — 19 years ago(August 16, 2006 01:53 AM)
Huh ???!!
I saw this movie when it came out in the movie theaters. I hope I could travel back in time to get my money back. Better yet I go b4 the movie is made and warn Eddie Murphy about the grievous mistake he's about to make; his career would be saved in the process!!!
I don't know. This movie is like being invited to go someplace you just don't want to visit. A place where you are mentally and intellectually mugged.
I mean, what were they thinking? Part 1 & Part 2 were awesome movies, even if after watching both you get the sense a few scenarios and ideas were essentially recycled and carbon copied.
Eddie Murphy should make another BHC movie, and pretend Part 3 never existed. Hey, maybe it was some freak dimensional accident. A wormhole perhaps touched down momentarily on the whole film crew and it resulted in the theatrical fart that this movie is.
Or maybe another actor can star in the main role of Axel Foley(I have that song by the way, Axel F., - by Herbie Hancock - totally cool)so they can make a remake of the original Beverly Hills Cop movie.
To sum this up, BHC 3 was a seriously awful film. Any one who posts here that it rules needs to get their head examined or they are probably Eddie Murphy.
Eddie Murphy, if that is you, shame on you.
" Lucy! You got some 'splaining to do " -
Sweet_Cookies — 19 years ago(August 16, 2006 04:26 AM)
AHHH! Did someone think I might change my mind about this movie? Possibly shed some good light on Beverly Hills Cop 3?
Hardly.
I just wanted to mention I made a mistake about something.
Actually it is Harold Faltermeyer that did Axel. F.
Oh, and stay away from BHC3.
Trust me.
" There's a new sheriff in town! " -
SycamoreNorth — 19 years ago(November 07, 2006 04:05 AM)
SweetCookies, apparently you are the only one on this message board topic who has not drank the "kool-aid." Not to get all film snob on the rest of you, but how the hell can you actually defend this movie? Seriously! I mean, when you have people calling the film "arsome" (as opposed to, oh, I don't know, "awesome" maybe?), I think the evidence speaks for itself.
Good night, and good luck. -
aseddon130 — 19 years ago(November 13, 2006 02:02 PM)
it was funny when i was 10, hilarious, as i grew up i found myself laughing less and less at it, it just cannot hold a candle to the other two and it's not a good movie in general.
"Prostitutes are rough, 1 of them made me wash me old man in't sink"
Max: "You took your dad??" -
harlemworldeva — 18 years ago(December 16, 2007 07:00 AM)
Of course this ovie isn't some cinematic masterpiece it's a tremendous guilty pleasure! Just plain fun.
I love this movie with all its goofs and stupidity. Judge Reinhold rocks and so does Eddie Murphy. -
lepunkdigitale — 17 years ago(August 23, 2008 09:23 PM)
I personally don't think anybody should be as snobby as to correct someone's grammar when they're simply discussing their reasons for liking a movie. Fair enough defend your side of the picture(with the acceptance that people are different and the common sense to realise that movie watching is a fairly relative affair of course) , but some people are dyslexic and may not be very good at spelling. We'd all do so much better in this world were it not for up turned noses getting in our way all the time.
-
lakrfan2834 — 19 years ago(February 18, 2007 06:19 PM)
I recently viewed this movie, and although I did not find it to be an unbelievable movie, it was definitely wildly entertaining. Murphy revived his role as Axel Foley quiete brilliantly, and the story had some pizazz to it. Its not a flippin award winning film, but it was enjoyable. ur overreacting bro.