Bottom 100?
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Children of the Corn III: Urban Harvest
VinnieAKAPopsMatchoman — 19 years ago(May 30, 2006 11:24 PM)
Come on, Bottom 100? I know the ending sucks with the crap FX, but come on, its' a pretty decent flick and there are way worse films out there- that's not opinion, that's fact.
-
BlueDragon21120 — 19 years ago(September 28, 2006 05:02 AM)
Acctually this is the worset movie ever made, for one, why would anyone try to take over the world with corn, and then make 2 sequels. Go watch the Shining or Jurassic Park, come back and pitty yourselves.
-
Jiiimbooh — 18 years ago(September 22, 2007 08:04 AM)
Name one????????
I can name several.
The Beast of Yucca Flats (1961)
Dracula vs. Frankenstein (1971)
Voyage to the Planet of Prehistoric Women (1968)
Generation Ax (1998)
House of the Dead (2003)
Want me to go on?
"What does it do?"
"It doesn't
do
anything. That's the beauty of it." -
geoffrey-51 — 18 years ago(January 04, 2008 11:25 AM)
by - Jiiimbooh on Sat Sep 22 2007 08:04:00
Name one????????
I can name several.
The Beast of Yucca Flats (1961)
Dracula vs. Frankenstein (1971)
Voyage to the Planet of Prehistoric Women (1968)
Generation Ax (1998)
House of the Dead (2003)
Want me to go on?
YES I WOULD LIKE YOU TO GO ON TILL YOU NAME A FILM WORSE THAN COTC3!!!!!! -
rosebud200320 — 18 years ago(February 02, 2008 02:42 AM)
I can name one, it is not in the horror section, but "Powder" I saw that one in the move houses and it was so boring, I fell asleep.
CHD Petition:
http://www.gopetition.com/online/16298.html -
Jiiimbooh — 18 years ago(March 25, 2008 05:19 AM)
geoffrey-51, I honestly don't think you have seen any of the movies I mentioned if you claim they are better than Children of the Corn III.
"What does it do?"
"It doesn't
do
anything. That's the beauty of it." -
gizmosloth — 16 years ago(August 29, 2009 04:27 AM)
well 1st of all i checked this movie aint on the bottom 100 unless something happened since 2006 and the ranking went up. well i agree it aint the worse movie not by far. i must admit though i do have a soft spot for horror movies even crappy ones. but when they are crappy i at least know that they are crappy. i just like them for how crappy they are. you know so bad they are good. well heres 1 movie that i will say that most people would probably think is worse than this movie even though personally i like it. but check out terror toons or anything made by joe castro. actually only seen 1 other movie made by him and i like that movie too. but for people that say this movie is so bad are most likely just trolls or people that dont know how to lower their standards a lil bit and enjoy life more.
-
Strazdamonas — 12 years ago(January 06, 2014 09:58 AM)
You could watch movies such as Black ribbon, Night of the tentacles, Warning: Pedifile released and similar films, if you can find them that is. they are FAR FAR worse than anything listed there.
Applied Science? All science is applied. Eventually. -
simba122504 — 14 years ago(July 23, 2011 09:33 PM)
I never knew it was in the bottom 100. No, it's not a classic, but it's pretty damn entertaining. Probably the best COTC sequel. I don't really remember the rest, but I remember this one.
Clark's destiny =
Superman
,
Lex Luthor
&
Lois Lane
. -
TrippingABlindMan — 14 years ago(January 01, 2012 01:33 AM)
I remember this used to be in the bottom 100, but while it is far from a "good" film, as a cheap horror flick it more than does the trick. Totally didn't belong in the league of films like House of the Dead or Manos (COTC 3 actually had some genuinely creepy parts too). Thankfully it has risen out of the list.
-
Burntout — 13 years ago(August 05, 2012 02:31 AM)
Agreedwhile it is a very very very bad movie indeed, it is not worthy of the Bottom 100. This is 1990s standard cliche horror all the way and to expect anything more would be pure ignorance on the part of any viewer.
I personally feel offended that such a piece of crap is available on the market, but like any good addict I will watch every single one of these horror films in the series simply b/c I thought the first one was mediocre.
I hate these people for ruining my life! -
ElectricWarlock — 12 years ago(February 02, 2014 09:27 AM)
It's no longer in the Bottom 100, but I am personally offended by the 3.8 rating it has because to me, it is the best of the series and one of the best horror movies of the 1990s. Sure, I agree it would've been better without the giant monster just like everyone else, but other than that it is perfect to me. I love everything about this movie. It is fun, has an interesting story, the characters are fascinating, and the acting is good. It is just a good movie all around and doesn't deserve any rating below a 6.0 at the very least. I personally give it a 9/10.
Death lives in the Vault of Horror! -
Roddenhyzer — 11 years ago(May 01, 2014 02:05 PM)
I liked it too, more so than expected. The death scenes were all very entertaining, with nice practical effects, and Eli was an improvement over the leader in the 2nd one, who was a bit too old for the whole "creepy kid" thing, in my opinion. There are many things to criticize, but I still had fun. I even liked the ridiculous monster at the end, to be honest
-
ElectricWarlock — 9 years ago(August 14, 2016 08:59 AM)
I'm still shocked this movie still only has a 4.0/10 though the score is slowly going up. I'd say it deserves at the very, very least a 6. It is the best film of the series and is very underrated. At least it's no longer in the Bottom 100 like apparently it was 10 years ago.