Are there sex scens in this movie?
-
thebratgirl — 16 years ago(January 05, 2010 12:07 PM)
agreed, i think this country (usa) makes people treat sex like a dirty secret shame that you're not supposed to look at discuss or even think about. it's sad, and it's probably the reason why this country is filled with sexual predators. i enjoy leo's early works very much
-
Chepseh — 20 years ago(April 29, 2005 08:03 AM)
Hello Holden!
Goethewas gay/bisexual? Wheres this information from? Please tell me! Im German, but Ive never heard that fact at school. Or elsewhere. We were told about Goethes affairs with /women/, and his later marriage to Mrs. Vulpius, and his /friendship/ with other male writers, especially Schiller. But gay aspects? No, no, nada. Really, where is your information from? ( I dont want to criticize you, Im curious. ) -
bobbyh64 — 20 years ago(December 08, 2005 05:03 AM)
I don't think it makes much sense to use today's definition of "gay" when talking about people who existed in a time when there was no gay identity. Back then it wasn't considered to be a part of someone's identity. It was considered to be a kind of mental illness, something that had to be cured, like lots of sexual disorders today. You can't really talk about them being gay from today's perspective. And it's not been proven that Walt Whitman was gay. That's just something that's been speculated based on his writing. When I had film classes in college I had to study some of this "queer theory" and I must say that to me it sounds like a lot of BS. It seems like these gay analyzers want certain people to be gay so they can say "look this person was gay and a genius." I don't buy into that stuff. Just because some guy is sensitive or expresses non-sexual love for his fellow men in poems (as Walt Whitman did) doesn't make him gay. To me they're just trying to say that there were a lot of brilliant gay people in history and looking for anything that slightly hints at someone being gay as the basis for it. Who cares what their sexuality was. If you don't know then you don't know. Speculation is pointless. It detracts from the individual's accomplishments.
-
blow_up_alien — 20 years ago(January 29, 2006 03:20 AM)
Leonardo Devinci was gay so were most of the population in ancient sparta for that matter, if you do ancient history. So definitely not unheard of. It wasnt accepted as a part of your identity in the same way as it is today though.
Oh and I heard about this movie after talking about Brokeback Mountain with a friend. I loved LOVED that movie. For anyone who has seen total eclipse, are they similar?? If i liked that one will I like this one? -
looking-glass-girl — 19 years ago(August 19, 2006 09:26 PM)
No, this is the big problem with attaching terms like "gay" and "straight" to a different culture. In Sparta, the men would have "relationships" (not actual sex though, that was outlawed and punishable by exile or suicide, it was an insult to Sparta) to strengthen their bond so that they would fight harder. The lover (Greek homosexual relationships were almost exclusively pederastic) would train the boy to fight. But they were not gay. They wed women and reproduced. To be in a pederastic relationship was common for the wealthy, and it was part of their education to choose a lover. This was not considered in conflict with marrying, because the relationship would be over by the time the boy came of age, replaced by a bond of friendship.
-
gumborific — 17 years ago(December 01, 2008 03:46 PM)
"Bisexuals were just unheard of in those days"
????
That could be the single most ignorant comment I have ever read.
"In our wings that bark, flashing teeth of brass, standing tall in the dark" - David Bowie