8.6 is very very high…
-
hodie1 — 10 years ago(September 03, 2015 06:14 PM)
I was entertained so much more by The Usual Suspects than by the other two named. So many little touches. It's a lot of fun and I rarely miss it if it's on.
I think films made before 1990 don't get the attention here that they should. But it isn't anything I lose sleep over. -
zgurierion — 10 years ago(September 29, 2015 03:17 PM)
Imagine watching this movie in 1995 you didnt have this kind of ending at that time, after that the twist ending was very fashionable, maybe us those who had watched this movie at that time rate this movie very high.
-
ironskeletor — 9 years ago(April 12, 2016 05:58 PM)
"SAW (2004), the mother of twists."
Good lord. Saw's is the most anemic plot twist not written by Shyamalan I know. It does exactly nothing to make you reconsider the events of the movie, and demonstrates better than any of Saw's other failings that the writers didn't know what they were doing. -
wiki119 — 9 years ago(September 23, 2016 12:05 PM)
i am 22 and my age has nothing to do with my liking lol.
If i watched it back in 1995, i would have definitely liked it more. But after a number of good movies have released i think it's kinda unfair for this movie to have such high rating. i'd give it around 8, but 8.6 is kinda high beats many good movies stuck at 8.5. idk i am just making a point. -
wiki119 — 9 years ago(September 24, 2016 11:41 AM)
dude just go check imdb top 250 movies, half of the movies in top 100 are really old and got top in list due to old voters. Take for example Rear Window (1954) making 40th at the list where Memento (2000), Django Unchained (2012), The Prestige (2006), Gladiator (2000), Heat (1995) and many more, which i found more interesting than Rear Window and The Usual Suspects, are underrated imo.
-
-
Stratego — 9 years ago(September 25, 2016 12:24 PM)
i am not saying " because i am young i should like new movies ".. definitely not
I never suggested that you were saying that. But you ARE saying that people vote for old movies because they're old themselves. In that case, I could just as well argue that you vote for newer movies because you are young.
Just that movies being released in old times have more votes compared to new ones, so ratings are unfair for new movies..
No, they're not. It's not like people have been able to vote for movies on IMDb since the 1950s. And you're wrong, a movie like The Prestige (2006) has 854.717 votes, while Rear Window (1954) only has 319.746 votes. If anything, I'd argue that the ratings are unfair because older movies have less votes than newer movies. -
Klockard23 — 9 years ago(September 25, 2016 08:02 PM)
dude just go check imdb top 250 movies, half of the movies in top 100 are really old and got top in list due to old voters. Take for example Rear Window (1954) making 40th at the list where Memento (2000), Django Unchained (2012), The Prestige (2006), Gladiator (2000), Heat (1995) and many more, which i found more interesting than Rear Window and The Usual Suspects, are underrated imo.
Ever consider the possibility that those films got higher votes because the people voting just simply liked them more? Also, Heat and The Usual Suspects were released in the same year.