Democrats retain majority on Pennsylvania Supreme Court!
-
bitchsurn — 4 months ago(November 05, 2025 08:01 PM)
I guess when you were posting from your hacienda in Argentina you were too busy herding your cattle to check on AI to see how the ballot was actually set up for that particular issue here in Pennsylvania.
Or maybe you were busy tending your veggy garden in Scotland.
It was not candidate A versus candidate B, it was simply "vote yes to retain or no to not retain" for each of the three justices. Had we voted not to retain any or all of the three on the ballot, at that point Governor Shapiro would have appointed a nominee (or nominees) for confirmation by the Pa. state senate, and down the road there would have been an election, and at that point it would be, as you, in your infinite wisdom stated, "monkeys versus beavers." -
Phaenon — 4 months ago(November 05, 2025 08:18 PM)
Great!
Thanks for reestablishing the well known rules for me
Now, since you seem to be capable of retaining your programming long enough to parrot it out to someone else, take this little nugget with you on your travels; In Argentina they don't have haciendas, they have bodegas
Now, onto your Pennsylvanian elections not being rigged and how that will ultimately affect the entirety of the US in the future…you do know what they Liberty Bell represents, don't you?
Ding Dong
!
-
bitchsurn — 4 months ago(November 05, 2025 08:27 PM)
No problem.
I thought you might appreciate that little nugget since, after reading your post, it was obvious that you had no clue (as usual) how our ballots were set up here in Pa for that particular issue.
But feel free to take time off from herding your cattle on your hacienda in Argentia (or tending your little Scottish vegetable garden) and demand that we do a recount on an election in which the results were about 62% to 38%.
But maybe first you should spend some more time on AI and research what the rules regarding recounts here in Pa actually are. -
Phaenon — 4 months ago(November 05, 2025 08:33 PM)
I've no need for AI, that's for people like you
I'll enjoy bibbing on my malbec and scoffing my haggis, perhaps I'll even have a chortle ever now and then, looking across the pond at these amazing polls which cannot, in so way, shape or form, be messed with ever - unless the result doesn't go the way you want it to of course. Then it's all Russia, China, them Jews!
Ding Dong
!
-
bitchsurn — 4 months ago(November 05, 2025 08:55 PM)
You are clueless, so as inaccurate as AI can be at times, it might actually help you out.
Stick to herding your cattle out there on your hacienda in Argentina.
unless the result doesn't go the way you want it to of course. Then it's all Russia, China, them Jews!
That pretty much sums up the way you cucks reacted in 2020, doesn't it. -
Phaenon — 4 months ago(November 05, 2025 09:05 PM)
It would seem that you tried to lump me in with others without my consent
Fascist much??!!
Also, didn't Obama say that there was no way that the elections could be broken or hijacked…and then Trump got elected for the first time?
I remember a whole bunch of snowflakes, turned SJWs, turned Antifa really,
really
thinking that some space laser Jews did something with the TV sets or something…
Lap it up fuzzball, you live in a kangaroo court and love it. I hear Hulk Hogan's coming back for 2028
Ding Dong
!
-
bitchsurn — 4 months ago(November 05, 2025 09:16 PM)
Donnie The Diddler claims that Prop 50 only passed (64 to 36) because "the voting was rigged."
Do an AI search and find out if it was Venezuelan voting machines or lasers from outer space that did the dirty work and get back to us. -
Phaenon — 4 months ago(November 05, 2025 09:21 PM)
Soap operas really aren't my thing
But you enjoy yourself, I hope it really tugs at the heart strings and makes you feel elated by the end
The rest of us, those who don't use AI to understand what's been going about since day dot, will enjoy watching as you figure out how futile the entire endeavour is
If, at any point, you want to come join us - feel free to. But keep the potty mouth and the limited intellect within the play area. We don't need to be putting up with that silliness out here
Ding Dong
!
-
Phaenon — 4 months ago(November 05, 2025 09:54 PM)
I completely understand retaining the judges, I'd vote to retain them personally
That said, I can also completely understand that the folks who voted Trump in November 2024 sticking to their guns and the outcome being closer to a 50/50 split
But, that wasn't the case
And PA is already in trouble for questionable conduct with vote counting. An ongoing investigation which will, no doubt, show some level of corruption which needs to be addressed
I mean I get it, Pennsylvania has a strong Germanic ethnicity in its population and I can understand a few of them wanting to 'correct the record' the way that a certain national socialist party did back in their mother's fatherland
I just don't think it is just and/or above reproach
NYC, they'll have it all counted to the millimetre. I can trust that they'll be easy to audit and the results will match with the evidence.
Those dodgy PA pollsters though…I can't say I trust em'
Ding Dong
!
-
bitchsurn — 4 months ago(November 05, 2025 10:32 PM)
I honestly do not know whether or not you are truly residing somewhere outside of the US, but your replies suggest that you don't know how elections seem to historically go here.
Midterms frequently do not attract the turnout of voters that the presidential elections do.
And as far as midterms go, these off year elections garner even less attention than the elections that occur every two years after the presidential elections.
When I went to the polling station for my township, I was actually the only voter at the time. Nobody else showed up when I was filling out my ballot. I live in a red county.
In the area I live in, prior to the election I didn't see any of the usual pre-election signs urging voters to (this time) choose either to retain or not to retain. Which is not to say that there were not any, but if there were some that I didn't notice, it certainly was not like a year when the POTUS is at stake or the two-year elections when the senate or the house is up. Meaning for the average voter, the Pa state supreme court didn't mean a whole lot. And in Pa the gubernatorial election won't be until '26.
As far as expecting a 50/50 split, that would depend upon who showed up. I don't know what the actual statewide turnout was yesterday, but it wasn't high where I am at. Then you have to consider that Donnie's approval rating with the middle and independents is down, so assuming there was a turnout comparable to a presidential election or even a true midterm (which I would bet that there was not a comparable turnout) it might be flawed logic to expect the middle and independent vote to split 50/50.
As far as trusting or not trusting elections in Pa, the Pa senate is now conservative, and it is the Pa house and senate that basically controls the way elections are conducted here. -
Phaenon — 4 months ago(November 05, 2025 10:45 PM)
Perhaps making sure that the election process itself doesn't have any party bias whatsoever in how it is operated is the way forward to a true democracy
I just wish someone had thought of that way back when the concept was introduced…
Ding Dong
!
-
bitchsurn — 4 months ago(November 05, 2025 11:02 PM)
Phaenon said...
Perhaps making sure that the election process itself doesn't have any party bias whatsoever in how it is operated is the way forward to a true democracy
I just wish someone had thought of that way back when the concept was introduced…
"All I want to do is this: I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. Fellas, I need 11,000 votes, give me a break." -
bitchsurn — 4 months ago(November 05, 2025 10:56 PM)
And PA is already in trouble for questionable conduct with vote counting. An ongoing investigation which will, no doubt, show some level of corruption which needs to be addressed
Apparently nothing major has been discovered yet.
https://www.spotlightpa.org/news/2024/11/pennsylvania-election-fraudulent-voter-registration-investigations-update/
The cursory googles I did on the subject all came back with results that are a year old, but what I am getting out of it is that Donnie was attempting to stir up distrust of the process prior to the '24 election, much like he was doing prior to the '20 election.
Since he won Pa in '24, he either doesn't give a **** anymore or the issues were rectified prior to this '25 election.
If something major had been discovered in Pa, I am pretty sure that I watch the local news enough that I would have heard some mention of it. Ande I am relatively sure that there would have been way more than just a passing mention.
