COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Just Shoot Me!

---

quasitheone — 14 years ago(December 19, 2011 03:51 PM)

Just to exemplify:
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com:443/data.filmboards/images/upload/YQIsb.jpg
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com:443/data.filmboards/images/upload/gynyr.jpg
Don't get me wrong. These're decent looking girls. But come on! On the cover of a vogue-esque fashion magazine? Which we have to stare a couple times during an episode?? Seriously, what were they thinking? Why were some of the cover girls really gorgeous and some of them are like.. u know..

[fgadmin]

Cloudburst2000 — 14 years ago(January 01, 2012 09:01 AM)

Oh please. It's a show about the people who work for the fashion magazine not the people on the magazine. They weren't going to waste their budget to pay high end models to pose for a fake cover shot.

[fgadmin]

quasitheone — 14 years ago(March 07, 2012 02:58 AM)

How much money does it take to get an easy-on-the-eyes girl if not hot? Even the cheapest porn sites get better girls. And this situation was almost exclusive to season 4 for some reason. It just got back to normal in season 5 again, girls were again ok to appear on a fashion magazine. So I was wondering if they were trying to make some sort of statement or something, cause money excuse is kinda ridiculous

[fgadmin]

the_10th — 14 years ago(March 14, 2012 02:53 PM)

Fiction. On TV. Who. Really Cares.
Wait. You do. And probably the only one.

[fgadmin]

quasitheone — 14 years ago(March 17, 2012 02:11 AM)

awful attempt at trolling

[fgadmin]

jmtrc — 14 years ago(March 21, 2012 12:17 AM)

Because beauty is in the eye of the beholder. They look fine to me.
http://mo3del.ru/files/pic_models/spoilers.jpg

[fgadmin]

mightygeo — 13 years ago(July 11, 2012 11:18 PM)

Uh these girls are just as good looking as the cover models real magazines use who can actually be quite peculiar looking, I mean does anyone really think Kate Moss is the least bit attractive?
BTW Isn't that Uma Thurman in that first photo?

[fgadmin]

quasitheone — 13 years ago(August 01, 2012 02:57 PM)

Uma? God NO! lol

[fgadmin]

Janiecraine — 12 years ago(March 10, 2014 02:01 PM)

Young Kate Moss was attractive.
https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=kate+moss&client=firefox-a&h s=6Ho&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=sb&source=lnm s&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=iiceU675F43jkAWO8ICwAQ&ved=0CAkQ_AU oAQ&biw=1280&bih=706#channel=sb&q=kate+moss+young&rls= org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbm=isch&facrc=&imgdii=&i mgrc=_sTwl7csbdzVoM%253A%3BsVziYRPRHGhdhM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fnews.bb c.co.uk%252Fnol%252Fshared%252Fspl%252Fhi%252Fpop_ups%252F05%252Fmagaz ine_kate_moss_through_the_years%252Fimg%252F1.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252 Fnews.bbc.co.uk%252F2%252Fshared%252Fspl%252Fhi%252Fpop_ups%252F05%252 Fmagazine_kate_moss_through_the_years%252Fhtml%252F1.stm%3B300%3B300

[fgadmin]

parisel — 12 years ago(May 11, 2013 11:25 AM)

quasi, I think those two are the same woman.
I guess it's like looking at clouds. You see one thing and I see another. Peace.

[fgadmin]

quasitheone — 12 years ago(August 31, 2013 06:32 AM)

i really dont think so

[fgadmin]

sfrsez — 11 years ago(June 02, 2014 01:18 PM)

you make a great point, details count.

[fgadmin]

thewanderingdreamer — 11 years ago(October 18, 2014 07:02 PM)

They're pretty enough but I wish they didn't have that "I just rolled out of bed" hair {was that the fad in those years}. The striped was pretty plain too.

[fgadmin]

ARH — 11 years ago(October 21, 2014 06:45 AM)

I think that Blush was supposed to be a Cosmo-type rather than a Vogue-esque magazine and the covers reflected that.

[fgadmin]

dbrockskk1 — 10 years ago(May 30, 2015 04:57 PM)

lol Are you in jr high?
suzycreamcheese RIP Heath Ledger 1979-2008