Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
15 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    the_10th — 14 years ago(March 14, 2012 02:53 PM)

    Fiction. On TV. Who. Really Cares.
    Wait. You do. And probably the only one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      quasitheone — 14 years ago(March 17, 2012 02:11 AM)

      awful attempt at trolling

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        jmtrc — 14 years ago(March 21, 2012 12:17 AM)

        Because beauty is in the eye of the beholder. They look fine to me.
        http://mo3del.ru/files/pic_models/spoilers.jpg

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          mightygeo — 13 years ago(July 11, 2012 11:18 PM)

          Uh these girls are just as good looking as the cover models real magazines use who can actually be quite peculiar looking, I mean does anyone really think Kate Moss is the least bit attractive?
          BTW Isn't that Uma Thurman in that first photo?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            quasitheone — 13 years ago(August 01, 2012 02:57 PM)

            Uma? God NO! lol

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              Janiecraine — 12 years ago(March 10, 2014 02:01 PM)

              Young Kate Moss was attractive.
              https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=kate+moss&client=firefox-a&h s=6Ho&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=sb&source=lnm s&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=iiceU675F43jkAWO8ICwAQ&ved=0CAkQ_AU oAQ&biw=1280&bih=706#channel=sb&q=kate+moss+young&rls= org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbm=isch&facrc=&imgdii=&i mgrc=_sTwl7csbdzVoM%253A%3BsVziYRPRHGhdhM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fnews.bb c.co.uk%252Fnol%252Fshared%252Fspl%252Fhi%252Fpop_ups%252F05%252Fmagaz ine_kate_moss_through_the_years%252Fimg%252F1.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252 Fnews.bbc.co.uk%252F2%252Fshared%252Fspl%252Fhi%252Fpop_ups%252F05%252 Fmagazine_kate_moss_through_the_years%252Fhtml%252F1.stm%3B300%3B300

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                parisel — 12 years ago(May 11, 2013 11:25 AM)

                quasi, I think those two are the same woman.
                I guess it's like looking at clouds. You see one thing and I see another. Peace.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  quasitheone — 12 years ago(August 31, 2013 06:32 AM)

                  i really dont think so 🙂

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    sfrsez — 11 years ago(June 02, 2014 01:18 PM)

                    you make a great point, details count.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      thewanderingdreamer — 11 years ago(October 18, 2014 07:02 PM)

                      They're pretty enough but I wish they didn't have that "I just rolled out of bed" hair {was that the fad in those years}. The striped was pretty plain too.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        ARH — 11 years ago(October 21, 2014 06:45 AM)

                        I think that Blush was supposed to be a Cosmo-type rather than a Vogue-esque magazine and the covers reflected that.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #15

                          dbrockskk1 — 10 years ago(May 30, 2015 04:57 PM)

                          lol Are you in jr high?
                          suzycreamcheese RIP Heath Ledger 1979-2008

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups