A new, better movie?
-
toolsquatch — 16 years ago(December 12, 2009 12:26 AM)
On one hand, I think you ought to spend your time developing a
new
idea to bring to the silver screen instead of continuing this "unnecessary remake/reboot" craze that's swept Hollywood.
On the other hand,
because
of this "unnecessary remake/reboot" craze, it might just be the only way you could get your name out there.
I say take the risk these weak-sauce film companies aren't willing to take: develop a new idea, everyone's got a bad aftertaste in their mouths from all of the crap from the past decade and if you truly want your vision to be appreciated to it's fullest I suggest you wait until the dust settles. -
lysergic-acid — 14 years ago(September 03, 2011 10:36 PM)
That's a terrible title. It should be called "slightly above average snake".
And I agree with the other poster. The first Anaconda was a decent film for its day. If you like movies like
Deep Blue Sea
and
Lake Placid
, then you'll enjoy Anaconda. The second one was a let down because the special effects, which should have been better, seemed worse than the first movie. -
bloodthirstyworks — 15 years ago(August 08, 2010 11:02 AM)
sorry dude but the idea kinda sucks especially the whole woman starting off as a mother, then becomes a bad ass..that is a clicheYou always see characters that start off being this way and in the end after going through some sort of a life changing experience becomes a whole new person in the endingno offense but it sounds like a b movie..a bad b movie..but like some other person posted below..try to develop a whole new idea..Anaconda was a good enough movieno reboots are actually necessary..
-
JurijFedorov — 10 years ago(February 05, 2016 01:12 AM)
No, it's copyrighted. You can't just make a new Matrix movie unless you only plan to show it to a few friends or of it so terrible bad the people behind Matrix won't notice it. It's not possible to just continue a series without contacting the owners.